1995
DOI: 10.1016/0168-5597(95)00045-t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain-stem auditory evoked potential monitoring. Variations of stimulus artifact in brain death

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
3
0
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results as well as other earlier studies showed an interesting phenomenon that biologically-related changes in stimulus artifacts occur, despite unchanged stimulus and monitoring parameters in coma depasse 13,14 . During our present study, measurements with laser stimulation showed a change in EAEP in the sense of a positive increase in these components, whereas results from previous studies on comatose patients or in the extreme case of coma depasse, indicated a contrary negative increase in activity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results as well as other earlier studies showed an interesting phenomenon that biologically-related changes in stimulus artifacts occur, despite unchanged stimulus and monitoring parameters in coma depasse 13,14 . During our present study, measurements with laser stimulation showed a change in EAEP in the sense of a positive increase in these components, whereas results from previous studies on comatose patients or in the extreme case of coma depasse, indicated a contrary negative increase in activity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…During our present study, measurements with laser stimulation showed a change in EAEP in the sense of a positive increase in these components, whereas results from previous studies on comatose patients or in the extreme case of coma depasse, indicated a contrary negative increase in activity. Similar results, namely, different early auditory evoked potential stimulation responses (wave I to V) to suction and pressure stimulation in healthy persons as well as in pathological cases, have already been discussed in literature 13,14 . The solution to this problem probably lies in the mechanics of the inner ear, but is not yet in sight.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…On the other hand, the presence of normal BAEPs does not reliably indicate a good outcome [10,13,[21][22][23]. Similarly, the absence of middle-latency auditory-evoked potentials (MLAEPs; appearing between 10 and 50 ms and probably signing the activation of thalamus and primary auditory cortex) is strongly associated with bad outcome in postanoxic coma [23][24][25].…”
Section: Short-latency Erpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ableitparameter beim Coma depassé (Hirntod) [15,16]. Pathologische Veränderungen im Bereich der Innenohrm e c h a n i k wurden als mögliche Erklärungen für die Zunahme des Artefaktes angenommen.…”
unclassified
“…Druckreize sowohl bei Normalpersonen als auch bei pathologischen Befundmustern, wurde in der Literatur bereits hingewiesen [15,16] …”
unclassified