2021
DOI: 10.18280/ts.380428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain Tumor Classification of MRI Images Using Deep Convolutional Neural Network

Abstract: Manual tumor diagnosis from magnetic resonance images (MRIs) is a time-consuming procedure that may lead to human errors and may lead to false detection and classification of the tumor type. Therefore, to automatize the complex medical processes, a deep learning framework is proposed for brain tumor classification to ease the task of doctors for medical diagnosis. Publicly available datasets such as Kaggle and Brats are used for the analysis of brain images. The proposed model is implemented on three pre-train… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accuracy measures the model’s overall performance in correctly classifying and is calculated as the ratio of correct predictions to the total number of predictions. The mathematical expressions for recall, precision, f1-score, and accuracy are represented by Equations (10)–(13) [ 64 ]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accuracy measures the model’s overall performance in correctly classifying and is calculated as the ratio of correct predictions to the total number of predictions. The mathematical expressions for recall, precision, f1-score, and accuracy are represented by Equations (10)–(13) [ 64 ]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is calculated by dividing the number of accurate predictions by the total number of predictions made. Equations (13)–(16) indicate the mathematical representations of precision, recall, F1-score, and accuracy [ 67 ]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data set 33 used in this study was split into three separate groups: the training set, testing set, and validation set, as mentioned in Table 4. It was obtained from a publically accessible repository.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%