2023
DOI: 10.1177/10732748231169149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain Tumor Radiogenomic Classification of O6-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase Promoter Methylation in Malignant Gliomas-Based Transfer Learning

Abstract: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is the subject of a challenge and attention in the field of oncology and raises many promises for preventive diagnosis, but also fears, some of which are based on highly speculative visions for the classification and detection of tumors. A brain tumor that is malignant is a life-threatening disorder. Glioblastoma is the most prevalent kind of adult brain cancer and the 1 with the poorest prognosis, with a median survival time of less than a year. The presence of O6 -methylguanine-D… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference could also be attributed to our reproduction as the original study only mentioned the names of the features and what classification models were used, but there was not further information on how the images were processed before calculating the features and there were not any comments on what hyper-parameters were used, necessitating our own parameter tuning, and producing radiomics features using images that were not necessarily pre-processed in the same way. From these results, along with the results from Capuozzo et al ( 2022 ) who used an external dataset, even though our results do not necessarily perform as well as the studies mentioned in the introduction section, (Han et al 2018 , Li et al 2018 , Le et al 2020 , Zlochower et al 2020 , Do et al 2022 , Sakly et al 2023 ), it is important to note that the differences in datasets make direct comparisons difficult. This denotes a need for an increase in reproducibility and data availability to determine the actual relative performance between these different models.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The difference could also be attributed to our reproduction as the original study only mentioned the names of the features and what classification models were used, but there was not further information on how the images were processed before calculating the features and there were not any comments on what hyper-parameters were used, necessitating our own parameter tuning, and producing radiomics features using images that were not necessarily pre-processed in the same way. From these results, along with the results from Capuozzo et al ( 2022 ) who used an external dataset, even though our results do not necessarily perform as well as the studies mentioned in the introduction section, (Han et al 2018 , Li et al 2018 , Le et al 2020 , Zlochower et al 2020 , Do et al 2022 , Sakly et al 2023 ), it is important to note that the differences in datasets make direct comparisons difficult. This denotes a need for an increase in reproducibility and data availability to determine the actual relative performance between these different models.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…Several previous studies have explored potential in using deep learning to predict methylation status on MR imaging. Depending on the data used, there has been some success with using convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to predict the methylation status with a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) ranging from 0.58 − 0.91, but due to the size of many of these study’s datasets, ranging from 53 − 498 patients, it is difficult to assess their generalizability, but they indicate promise in using machine learning techniques to identify features correlated with MGMT methylation (Han et al 2018 , Li et al 2018 , Le et al 2020 , Zlochower et al 2020 , Adam Flanders 2021 , Do et al 2022 , Sakly et al 2023 ). There are two analyses that we have found that use the same dataset as this study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promotor methylation decreases the gene expression and improves glioma response to radiotherapy and alkylating agents [ 95 , 96 ]. Sakly et al (2023) [ 80 ] used a pre-trained CNN model to predict the MGMT promotor methylation status based on the multimodal MRI images of glioma patients. They used the TL to transfer the convolutional layers of the CNN model and build a new classifier for this task.…”
Section: Gene Expressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They used the TL to transfer the convolutional layers of the CNN model and build a new classifier for this task. They used two models (ResNet-50 and DenseNet-201), reaching an accuracy of 100%, but the ResNet50 model had fewer layers and took less elapsed time [ 80 ].…”
Section: Gene Expressionmentioning
confidence: 99%