2022 25th International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/iccit57492.2022.10054934
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain Tumor Segmentation using Enhanced U-Net Model with Empirical Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, they introduced a novel regression model for predicting brain tumor patients' survival rates, showing moderate accuracy on the tested datasets. Al Nasim et al [21] focussedon segmenting necrotic, edematous, growing, and healthy tissue regions within the brain tumors. The use of U-Net's encoder-decoder architecture and image segmentation to exclude background details enhances efficiency.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, they introduced a novel regression model for predicting brain tumor patients' survival rates, showing moderate accuracy on the tested datasets. Al Nasim et al [21] focussedon segmenting necrotic, edematous, growing, and healthy tissue regions within the brain tumors. The use of U-Net's encoder-decoder architecture and image segmentation to exclude background details enhances efficiency.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, the model lacked the hyper-parameters needed to evaluate its performance consistency, which was this work's most significant limitation. Using many versions of the BraTS datasets for training and improvement, Al Nasim et al [25] introduced an enhanced structure of a 2D U-Net network. This study shows that the 2019 BraTS dataset yielded necrotic, Edema, and enhancing dice scores of 0.85, 0.94, and 0.88, respectively, which are statistically indistinguishable from the 2017-2018-2020 BraTS datasets.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, our model applied robust feature maps extracted by a multiattention mechanism to segment and predict the three kinds of brain tumors involved in the BraTS dataset. [25], a 2D UNet network has been introduced to be enhanced and trained using several versions of the BraTS datasets. This study shows that the BraTS datasets from 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2020 have similar dice scores for Necrotic, Edema, and Enhancing regions compared to the 2019 BraTS dataset.…”
Section: Comparative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The authors of the article [25] have incorporated a 3D attention module with the decoder pathways of a basic U-Net architecture and obtained mean dice scores of 0.778, 0.868, and 0.777 for enhancing tumor, whole, and core respectively on Brats 2019 dataset. Another work based on the U-Net architecture was carried out by Al Nasim et al [26], in which a 2D approach was developed. The proposed model outperformed the same dataset, achieving maximum accuracy of 99.8%, sensitivity of 99.7%, specificity of 99.91% and mean scores of 0.94, 0.95 and 0.871 for tumors, whole body and cardiac enhancement respectively, compared to other CNN-based models such as FCNN and RCNN.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%