1990
DOI: 10.1016/0896-6273(90)90031-a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain α-bungarotoxin binding protein cDNAs and MAbs reveal subtypes of this branch of the ligand-gated ion channel gene superfamily

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
330
2
2

Year Published

1990
1990
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 451 publications
(345 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
11
330
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The precise spatial relationship between the key residues contributing to the receptor binding site [21,22] may vary among receptor subtypes and hence could influence the affinity of binding of MLA. Sequence analysis of the two (Ybungarotoxin binding proteins recently cloned from chick brain [7] shows them to have lower homology with other avian nicotinic receptor subunits (less than 50% in every case [7]) than there is between neuronal and muscle nicotinic receptor subunits. That is to say, within the same species the enigmatic brain abungarotoxin binding protein is less similar to the muscle nicotinic receptor, which also binds a-bungarotoxin (see Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The precise spatial relationship between the key residues contributing to the receptor binding site [21,22] may vary among receptor subtypes and hence could influence the affinity of binding of MLA. Sequence analysis of the two (Ybungarotoxin binding proteins recently cloned from chick brain [7] shows them to have lower homology with other avian nicotinic receptor subunits (less than 50% in every case [7]) than there is between neuronal and muscle nicotinic receptor subunits. That is to say, within the same species the enigmatic brain abungarotoxin binding protein is less similar to the muscle nicotinic receptor, which also binds a-bungarotoxin (see Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In view of the current uncertainty about the physiological status of ['251]cu-bungarotoxin binding sites in the mammalian CNS (see [6,7]), a pharmacological probe showing selectivity for this site would be very useful. Although the rw-bungarotoxin binding component in vertebrate brain shows homology with nAChR at the protein [S] and gene [7] level, there is little direct evidence that this protein has any role in synaptic transmission in the brain, despite its clear nicotinic pharmacology in binding experiments. Exceptions include the chick optic tectum [S] and cerebellar interneurones [9], where ~-bungarotoxin has been shown to antagonize nicotinic responses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A different possibility for the lack of rapid desensitization is that presynaptic ␣7-nAChRs may differ in composition from the homomeric ␣7-nAChR described previously (Couturier et al, 1990;Schoepfer et al, 1990;Chen and Patrick, 1997;Drisdel and Green, 2000). Heteromeric receptors containing the ␣7 and ␤2 gene products can be produced by heterologous coexpression, and the receptors have diminished rates of desensitization (Khiroug et al, 2002).…”
Section: Synaptic Options On Neurons Presynaptic Sitesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This regulation is made possible by the fact that all vertebrate nAChRs, including both muscle and neuronal receptors, are cation-selective ligand-gated ion channels with significant relative permeabilities to calcium. The most extreme appears to be that of nicotinic receptors containing the ␣7 gene product (Couturier et al, 1990;Schoepfer et al, 1990); they equal or exceed NMDA receptors in relative calcium permeability (Bertrand et al, 1993;Seguela et al, 1993). Such receptors (␣7-nAChRs) are one of the two most abundant nicotinic receptor subtypes expressed in brain (Sargent, 1993;Gotti et al, 1994;Lindstrom, 1996;Role and Berg, 1996;Conroy and Berg, 1998), and in contrast to NMDA receptors, they do not require the postsynaptic membrane to be depolarized before promoting calcium influx.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of even only one (ay subunit) (Schoepfer et al 1990;Couturier et al 1990 a) in Xenopus oocytes suffices to yield a functional receptor which also desensitizes but may display an ionic selectivity (high permeability to Ca 2+ ) distinct from that of the muscle receptor Vernino et al 1992). On the basis of the primary amino acid sequence data of the purified subunits (Devillers-Thiery et al 1979;Raftery et al 1980), the cDNA and genes coding for the several subunits of electric organ and skeletal muscle receptor were cloned and sequenced (Noda et al 1982(Noda et al , 1983Claudio et al 1983;Devillers-Thiery et al 1983, Numa, 1989.…”
Section: The N I C O T I N I C Receptor Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%