1986
DOI: 10.1002/hep.1840060622
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brainstem auditory evoked potentials in hepatic encephalopathy

Abstract: Brainstem auditory evoked potentials were obtained from 30 patients primarily with viral hepatitis to determine the functional status of the brainstem in hepatic encephalopathy. The patients were divided into four groups: Group 1 with compensated hepatic diseases; Group 2 with hepatic failure but no hepatic encephalopathy; Group 3 with Grade 1 or 2 hepatic encephalopathy, and Group 4 with Grade 3 or 4 hepatic encephalopathy. The brainstem auditory evoked potential central conduction times (I-V interval) of fou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chu and Yang (30) have shown that the late cortical components of somatosensory evoked potentials are affected by preclinical and clinical encephalopathy. They have further shown that hepatic dysfunction without cirrhosis whether or not due to alcohol ingestion will not produce these changes (3,31,32). The comparison of the nonalcoholic and alcoholic cirrhotics in this study would confirm the impression that the findings are not solely a result of alcohol ingestion.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Chu and Yang (30) have shown that the late cortical components of somatosensory evoked potentials are affected by preclinical and clinical encephalopathy. They have further shown that hepatic dysfunction without cirrhosis whether or not due to alcohol ingestion will not produce these changes (3,31,32). The comparison of the nonalcoholic and alcoholic cirrhotics in this study would confirm the impression that the findings are not solely a result of alcohol ingestion.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…59 These findings prove that HE influences hemispheric multisynaptic pathways more than subcortical brainstem neurotransmission. 34,[60][61][62] The same findings were confirmed in HE of acute liver failure: the disappearance of the middle latency cortical component (e.g., N70) precedes that of the earlier components (e.g., N20 and P25) and the increase of central conduction time. However, the delay of middle latency cortical components of SSEPs was found to be less sensitive than that of the cognitive evoked potential P300 in the model of HE caused by TIPS insertion, 63 and no comparison with the EEG was produced for this indication.…”
Section: Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potentials (Baeps)supporting
confidence: 53%
“…Higher intensities of 70 to 80 dB were sometimes needed to elicit responses. 28 ERPs are therefore not suitable for patients with severe HE who are unlikely to follow instructions. Factors such as age, task difficulty, and compliance of the subjects can also affect the latency of P300 of AEP and visual evoked potentials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%