2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.06.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brand orientation, employer branding and internal branding: Do they effect on recruitment during the COVID-19 pandemic?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“… Individual-level employee outcomes: Based on employer branding research (Backhaus and Tikoo, 2004; Lievens and Highhouse, 2003, 2016), we propose that new recruits and existing employees who experience attractive industry employee value propositions in their own hospitality workplace will be affirmed in an ongoing manner through feeling a greater sense of belonging, satisfaction and motivation, engagement, morale and job satisfaction. As a result, these employees’ long-term turnover intentions are likely to be reduced. Meso-level organisation outcomes: Extrapolating again from the employer branding literature (Chapman et al , 2005; Kucherov et al , 2022; Theurer et al , 2018; Verčič, 2021), it is likely that hospitality employers will benefit from attracting a larger talent pool of quality applicants in which they can compete, through their own employer brands, with other hospitality organisations. An attractive industry talent brand should result in a greater number and quality of both applicants and new recruits, in addition to fostering greater job satisfaction and engagement in existing staff.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“… Individual-level employee outcomes: Based on employer branding research (Backhaus and Tikoo, 2004; Lievens and Highhouse, 2003, 2016), we propose that new recruits and existing employees who experience attractive industry employee value propositions in their own hospitality workplace will be affirmed in an ongoing manner through feeling a greater sense of belonging, satisfaction and motivation, engagement, morale and job satisfaction. As a result, these employees’ long-term turnover intentions are likely to be reduced. Meso-level organisation outcomes: Extrapolating again from the employer branding literature (Chapman et al , 2005; Kucherov et al , 2022; Theurer et al , 2018; Verčič, 2021), it is likely that hospitality employers will benefit from attracting a larger talent pool of quality applicants in which they can compete, through their own employer brands, with other hospitality organisations. An attractive industry talent brand should result in a greater number and quality of both applicants and new recruits, in addition to fostering greater job satisfaction and engagement in existing staff.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper makes a novel contribution to the hospitality management and talent attraction literature via a new concept – industry talent branding. Individual organisations within the industry have been exploring and applying the concept of employer branding over the past few decades (Backhaus and Tikoo, 2004; Davies, 2008; Kucherov et al , 2022; Theurer et al , 2018; Verčič, 2021). However, this has improved access to talent for some organisations over others.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Le fait de considérer les employés comme des clients internes peut engendrer une certaine confusion entre deux concepts : la marque employeur et le branding interne (Aurand et al, 2005 ; Mosley, 2007 ; Raj et Jyothi, 2011). Kucherov et al (2022) et Saleem et Iglesias (2016) avancent que l'utilisation interchangeable de ces deux concepts crée une confusion et freine leur développement. Ces concepts diffèrent selon cinq dimensions : discipline, objectif, orientation, composants et rôle de la marque (Aurand et al, 2005 ; Aydon Simmons, 2009 ; Mosley, 2007 ; Raj et Jyothi, 2011 ; Saleem et Iglesias, 2016).…”
Section: Cadre Conceptuelunclassified
“…Treating employees as internal customers while implementing different IB processes gives rise to confusion between the concepts of employer branding and IB (Aurand et al, 2005; Mosley, 2007; Raj and Jyothi, 2011). Kucherov et al (2022) and Saleem and Iglesias (2016) argue that the interchangeable use of these two concepts creates confusion and prevents their development. The concepts differ to a certain extent along five dimensions: discipline, goal, focus, components, and brand role (Aurand et al, 2005; Aydon Simmons, 2009; Mosley, 2007; Raj and Jyothi, 2011; Saleem and Iglesias, 2016).…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%