2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2009.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brand positivity and competitive effects on the evaluation of brand extensions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(55 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, relatively few studies have investigated the effect of brand attitude in the context of vertical extensions (Kim & Lavack, 1996;Kim et al, 2001;Kirmani et al, 1999;Musante, 2007 As Kapoor and Heslop (2009) note, the positive transfer of associations between the parent brand and its extension also depend upon the 'fit' between the two. Indeed, extant research has consistently identified fit as the main factor considered by consumers in the evaluation of both line and category extensions (e.g.…”
Section: Main Pathsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, relatively few studies have investigated the effect of brand attitude in the context of vertical extensions (Kim & Lavack, 1996;Kim et al, 2001;Kirmani et al, 1999;Musante, 2007 As Kapoor and Heslop (2009) note, the positive transfer of associations between the parent brand and its extension also depend upon the 'fit' between the two. Indeed, extant research has consistently identified fit as the main factor considered by consumers in the evaluation of both line and category extensions (e.g.…”
Section: Main Pathsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to these, Kapoor & Heslop (2009) have emphasized in their study that it is also possible to evaluate brand extensions independent from the main brand. According to this it has been figured out that, individual evaluations result in positivism about the brand.…”
Section: Consumers' Attitudes Depending On the Type Of Brand Extensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No Aaker & Keller, 1990;Barone et al, 2000;Boush & Loken, 1991;Dodds & Romeo, 1991;Joiner, 2006;Kalamas et al, 2006;Kapoor & Heslop, 2009;Kim, 2003;Kim & John, 2008;Klink & Smith, 2001;Maoz & Tybout, 2002;Monga & John, 2007;Park & Kim, 2001;Yeo & Park, 2006 No Yes Martin et al, 2005;Meyers-Levy et al, 1994;Milberg, Park, & McCarthy, 1997 Yes No Barone & Miniard, 2002;Boush et al, 1987;Keller & Aaker, 1992 Yes Yes Nan, 2006;Taylor & Bearden, 2002 wide range of values or was focused on positive, neutral, or negative values of brand attitude. Instead, Nan only reported that brand attitude conditions were derived from a median split of data without reporting any numerical values.…”
Section: Nomentioning
confidence: 99%