2018
DOI: 10.1007/s13162-018-0110-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brand-self connections and brand prominence as drivers of employee brand attachment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
1
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On a conceptual level, our research extends theories of person branding by shedding light on the challenges and opportunities that face people who have, or who are building, high-profile professional brands while holding prestigious posts, a topic not touched on in prior research on people managing professional brands (e.g., Close, Moulard, and Monroe 2011; Parmentier, Fischer, and Reuber 2013; Zamudio, Wang, and Haruvy 2013). Our research also complements prior work on the complex symbolic relationship between employees and the brands they work for (e.g., Gill-Simmen et al 2018; Tavassoli, Sorescu, and Chandy 2014) by identifying boundary conditions on the extent to which employees may derive benefits from employment affiliations with powerful brands. Finally, our work can provide practical guidance for individuals facing critical decisions regarding how to promote and protect their interests as they manage their professional brands over the course of their careers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On a conceptual level, our research extends theories of person branding by shedding light on the challenges and opportunities that face people who have, or who are building, high-profile professional brands while holding prestigious posts, a topic not touched on in prior research on people managing professional brands (e.g., Close, Moulard, and Monroe 2011; Parmentier, Fischer, and Reuber 2013; Zamudio, Wang, and Haruvy 2013). Our research also complements prior work on the complex symbolic relationship between employees and the brands they work for (e.g., Gill-Simmen et al 2018; Tavassoli, Sorescu, and Chandy 2014) by identifying boundary conditions on the extent to which employees may derive benefits from employment affiliations with powerful brands. Finally, our work can provide practical guidance for individuals facing critical decisions regarding how to promote and protect their interests as they manage their professional brands over the course of their careers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Yes, I’m interested in all that, but it almost seemed, at one point, a challenge to reach out to more people. (Amed 2015)The observation that affiliations with prestigious employers can have identity-related benefits resonates with marketing research suggesting that professionals value being associated with strong brands (Gill-Simmen et al 2018; Tavassoli, Sorescu, and Chandy 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…As current research shows, people can become instantaneously attached to, and find it hard to give up, the digital services they use [ 56 ]. Future work that explores how dentists can make use of social media and other mHealth solutions to further their self-identification with their profession and pride [ 57 ] and ensure patients lead healthier lives [ 58 ] is richly deserving.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is broader support for the notion that potential and current employees seek out a sense of personal authenticity at work (e.g., Bloemer & Dekker, 2007), underscoring the opportunity for socially responsible employer brands to enable positive outcomes for both employees and the firm. More specifically, Gill-Simmen et al (2018) propose that an employee's psychological connection to the brand is distinctive from their attachment or commitment to the organisation (e.g., organisation identification). Thus, employee benefits (e.g., a sense of personal authenticity) may stem more particularly from CSR brand-self connections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%