This article poses the research question of how readers of poetry react to the phenomenon of "corona poetry" by assessing their attitude toward poems on Covid-19, especially focusing on the specific arguments these readers put to the fore. These arguments are interpreted in light of the opposition between autonomous and heteronomous poetry, thus revealing whether readers of poetry primarily affirm the idea that a poem is a linguistic work of art, or rather evaluate the genre in terms of its social, ideological or therapeutic function.By analyzing the results of a questionnaire that has been disseminated among readers of poetry in the Netherlands and Belgium, the article demonstrates that the attitude toward corona poems is primarily negative, although it becomes clear that many readers use poetry to deal with the global crisis. In readers' reflections on corona poetry, heteronomous arguments seem to prevail over autonomous arguments.