Branding destinations: symbolic and narrative representations and co-branding

Abstract

This article explores the presence of symbolic and narrative representations on destination websites, and the explicit presence of co-branding in the form of partner logos. In contrast to previous research that tends to focus on case-studies, this article adopts a survey approach. The study undertakes a content analysis of the websites of the eighty-two destinations identified on the VisitBritain website, including cities, regions, towns, villages, and islands. On these websites there is strong evidence of symbolic branding in the form of logos. However, less than half have a clear brand narrative in the form of a slogan. In addition, less than half exhibit some form of explicit co-branding, and where co-branding is evident it is often limited to development agencies of the city or county council. Furthermore, most villages, towns and small islands lack a brand narrative and do not engage in co-branding. Accordingly, whilst destinations do have a website and a logo there is a deficit with regard to brand narratives and co-branding.

Can Post-Vaccine ‘Vaxication’ Rejuvenate Global Tourism? Nexus between COVID-19 Branded Destination Safety, Travel Shaming, Incentives and the Rise of Vaxication Travel

“…Destination branding in tourism literature has been justified as a source of the stimulation of customer satisfaction, attaining a competitive advantage through the creation of differentiation, and establishing a unique association with the destination [36][37][38], thereafter leading to customer loyalty behavioral intentions and repeated tourism [39,40]. Likewise, destination image has also been a popular subject for researchers and marketers [29].…”

What Shapes Activity Preferences? The Role of Tourist Personality, Destination Personality and Destination Image: Evidence from Serbia

“…Destination personality and image, although well researched, remain popular topics in the tourism literature [11][12][13][14][15][16]. Previous research sheds light on how these constructs influence tourist behavior in general-particularly in explaining the influence of destination personality [17][18][19][20], destination image [21][22][23][24][25], and tourists' individual characteristics on destination image and destination personality [8,16,23,[26][27][28][29][30].…”

Swooshed: How Nike and the City of New York could potentially change the landscape of city branding through apparel licensing agreements

“…Yet, there is scant evidence suggesting that co‐branding is accomplished through public and private entities working together. In Rowley and Hanna's (2020) examination of 82‐based Britain destinations, only Liverpool emerged as a city exhibiting any evidence of co‐branding with private‐sector organizations. This provides initial evidence that the Nike and the City of New York licensing agreement is indeed as novel as Nike (2019) claims it to be.…”

“…An alternative way that governments can engage in branding is through the mechanism of co-branding (Lucarelli, 2012(Lucarelli, , 2017Rowley & Hanna, 2020). Co-branding is described as the interactive relationship between two or more brands that illustrates a reciprocal relationship developed for the achievement of benefits tied to each participating brand's interests (Helmig et al, 2008;Lucarelli, 2017).…”