Branding’s academic–practitioner gap: managers’ views

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to investigate marketing managers’ views on the existence and nature of the academic–practitioner gap in the branding domain. Design/methodology/approach Using a purposive sampling method, the researchers conduct semi-structured qualitative interviews with 20 experienced marketing managers from a wide range of industries and organisations, whose roles are focussed on the planning, implementation and management of broad marketing and branding strategies. Findings Branding practitioners have little or no contact with academics and their theories-in-use with regard to brand management suggest they do not consider academic research relevant to their work. Research limitations/implications The process of describing and explaining the gap provides valuable insights into bridging the gap; it provides actionable branding strategies that include raising awareness, building relationships, improving the benefits offer and communicating more effectively. Practical implications This research has practical implications for branding academics. The interviewed practitioners confirm the gap, viewing it as academics’ (not practitioners’) problem and responsibility. They characterise it as a branding problem that academics can overcome using branding strategies, to establish themselves as credible sources of branding expertise for practitioners. Key areas for increasing collaboration stem from practitioners’ desire for independent, credible, ethical and timely third-party advice on branding issues; relevant, timely and shorter professional branding education across their organisations; and closer connections with universities to identify new branding talent and ideas. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this paper is the first to empirically examine and recommend solutions to the academic-practitioner gap in the branding domain by studying marketing professionals with branding responsibilities, using in-depth interviews.

Thirty years of product and brand management research: a retrospective review of the Journal of Product and Brand Management using bibliometric analysis

“…The second and third RQs focused on identifying JPBM research constituents in terms of publications and impact measures, and it was discovered that articles, authors and institutions from the USA dominated the performance metrics. Moving forward, the editors and editorial board members of JPBM could consider inviting marketing professionals with branding responsibilities to collaborate with marketing scholars and contribute to the journal and thus contribute to bridging the academic-practitioner gap in the branding domain highlighted by Alpert et al (2022).…”

Perspectives on the History and Future of the Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy (ANZMAC)

“…Vilkelyte, 2018) and has been the explicit theme for ANZMAC conferences in 1998, 2001 and 2018, along with many calls by keynote speakers and journal editors for enhancing ‘relevance’ (Harrigan et al, 2022). Nonetheless, the academic-practitioner gap remains (Alpert et al, 2022; Patel et al, 2019).…”

Developing and Sustaining a Vibrant Regional Academic Organisation

“…The statement draws attention to the lack of progress in academics engaging with practitioners, whether in marketing or other disciplines such as engineering, economics, psychology, urban design, computer science, health, other industries or government. There is a need to interact with industry and society more effectively and sustainably (Alpert et al, 2022). Ways have been proposed at the macro level, such as through a shared vision of academia, embedding society as a central pillar (Conduit et al, 2022).…”