2010
DOI: 10.1353/trn.0.0059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brazil's 'pro-poor' strategies: what South Africa could learn

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given similar authoritarian pasts, policymakers in both Brazil and South Africa faced the dilemma of democratization coinciding with economic adjustment, as newly elected rulers had to negotiate their country's integration with a competitive global economy. One of the greatest challenges in this regard is the extent to which major industries had to be restructured, with industrial workers facing retrenchment and unions struggling to retain jobs precisely when workers acquired full rights of citizenship (Seidman 2010: 87).…”
Section: Coming To Power: Restrained Redistributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given similar authoritarian pasts, policymakers in both Brazil and South Africa faced the dilemma of democratization coinciding with economic adjustment, as newly elected rulers had to negotiate their country's integration with a competitive global economy. One of the greatest challenges in this regard is the extent to which major industries had to be restructured, with industrial workers facing retrenchment and unions struggling to retain jobs precisely when workers acquired full rights of citizenship (Seidman 2010: 87).…”
Section: Coming To Power: Restrained Redistributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 4 In 1989 Brazil's Gini coefficient stood at 0.634. By 2009 it dropped to 0.526, while in South Africa from 2001 to 2006 the Gini coefficient remained at 0.66 (Seidman 2010: 86).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until recently, democratic Brazil seemed to offer an inspiring case of reform, with a newly democratized state led by a political party closely allied to militant labour unions. Beginning in the early 2000s, Brazil’s labour-friendly government gradually strengthened labour laws, and, perhaps even more significantly, strengthened enforcement, extending ‘formal’ employment status to many more workers and giving them greater access to workplace-linked pensions, health care and other benefits (Pires, 2008; Pochman, 2009; Seidman, 2010). But when a major recession hit, starting in 2014 and deepening in 2015, wealthier citizens rebelled against redistributive social policies.…”
Section: The Sociological Imagination: Can Transnational Campaigns ‘Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These increases directly affect the Beneficio Prestado Continuado (BPC) pension program, which has expanded coverage to nearly 90 percent of elderly Brazilians. This monthly payment is denominated in terms of the minimum wage, meaning that mandatory salary increases also strengthen the incomes of pension earners and the households in which they live (Seidman, 2010). Since the late 1990s the Bolsa Família (Family Grant) cash transfer program has steadily grown, disbursing a record R$17.1 billion and reaching more than 50 million individuals in 2011.…”
Section: Examining the New Developmentalismmentioning
confidence: 99%