2013
DOI: 10.15376/biores.8.1.1166-1185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brazilian Lignocellulosic Wastes for Bioenergy Production: Characterization and Comparison with Fossil Fuels

Abstract: The aim of this paper was to analyze energy-related properties of forestry and agricultural wastes for energy production purposes, and to compare them with fossil fuels. The forestry wastes used were red cedar, Eucalyptus, and Pinus wood shavings. The agricultural wastes analyzed were rice husk, coffee wastes, sugar cane bagasse, maize harvesting wastes, and bamboo cellulose pulp. The forestry wastes presented more suitable properties for bioenergy production than the agricultural wastes. Desirable energetic p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
65
2
12

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
8
65
2
12
Order By: Relevance
“…The samples retained between the 60 and 200 mesh sieves were used, in the same manner as used by (Protásio et al 2013a). The oxygen content was determined by difference (Equation 1) (Bech et al 2009; Protásio et al 2013a). Based on the contents of the elemental constituents, the ratios N/C, H/C and O/C were obtained, as well as the molar ratios and the empirical formula of biomass.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The samples retained between the 60 and 200 mesh sieves were used, in the same manner as used by (Protásio et al 2013a). The oxygen content was determined by difference (Equation 1) (Bech et al 2009; Protásio et al 2013a). Based on the contents of the elemental constituents, the ratios N/C, H/C and O/C were obtained, as well as the molar ratios and the empirical formula of biomass.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The world seeks to reduce the burning of fossil fuels to reduce the greenhouse effect (Zhu et al 2011), and biomass use is a viable alternative (Protásio et al 2013, Musinguzi et al 2012, Telmo and Lousada 2011.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the properties of raw biomass, such as its high oxygen content, high moisture, low calorific value, large particle size, and grinding difficulty, have limited the further development of biomass application technology ( van der Stelt et al 2011;Chen et al 2012a;Yin et al 2012). Moreover, in order to avoid the CO2 costs related to transportation, leading to greater end-use efficiency, bioenergy should be generated in the same locale where biomass is produced (Protasio et al 2013). Also, the selection of an appropriate pretreatment approach is understood to be the key to addressing biomass defects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%