2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-98305-5_31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brazilian Portuguese Speech Recognition Using Wav2vec 2.0

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Table 3 we show the performance of four ASRs trained with Brazilian Portuguese datasets, varying the amount of spontaneous and prepared speech data. [Candido Junior et al 2021] 0,221 0,132 0,534 0,436 0,742 0,503 0,241 0,164 0,228 0,104 0,457 0,281 [Ferreira and dos Reis Oliveira 2022] 0,247 0,147 0,529 0,453 0,738 0,521 0,269 0,186 0,230 0,102 0,461 0,289 [Grosman 2022] 0,265 0,168 0,523 0,484 0,754 0,564 0,265 0,180 0,201 0,105 0,451 0,304 [Stefanel Gris et al 2022] 0,333 0,186 0,656 0,516 0,859 0,600 0,319 0,203 0,321 0,150 0,588 0,365 Average 0,267 0,158 0,561 0,472 0,773 0,547 0,274 0,183 0,245 0,115 0,489 0,309 Table 3. Performance, using WER and CER, of four ASRs trained with BP data.…”
Section: Results Using Cer and Wer Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In Table 3 we show the performance of four ASRs trained with Brazilian Portuguese datasets, varying the amount of spontaneous and prepared speech data. [Candido Junior et al 2021] 0,221 0,132 0,534 0,436 0,742 0,503 0,241 0,164 0,228 0,104 0,457 0,281 [Ferreira and dos Reis Oliveira 2022] 0,247 0,147 0,529 0,453 0,738 0,521 0,269 0,186 0,230 0,102 0,461 0,289 [Grosman 2022] 0,265 0,168 0,523 0,484 0,754 0,564 0,265 0,180 0,201 0,105 0,451 0,304 [Stefanel Gris et al 2022] 0,333 0,186 0,656 0,516 0,859 0,600 0,319 0,203 0,321 0,150 0,588 0,365 Average 0,267 0,158 0,561 0,472 0,773 0,547 0,274 0,183 0,245 0,115 0,489 0,309 Table 3. Performance, using WER and CER, of four ASRs trained with BP data.…”
Section: Results Using Cer and Wer Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ASR model described in [Candido Junior et al 2021] presents the best average values of WER and CER for the five inquiries evaluated (0.393 and 0.268, respectively), while the model described in [Stefanel Gris et al 2022], which was trained only with prepared speech, has the worst performance for all the five inquiries. [Ferreira and Oliveira 2022] and [Grosman 2022] models also presented consistent results, with a small advantage for Ferreira and Oliveira's model.…”
Section: Results Using Cer and Wer Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations