2017
DOI: 10.1140/epjst/e2016-60165-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breakdown of equipartition in diffuse fields caused by energy leakage

Abstract: Abstract. Equipartition is a central concept in the analysis of random wavefields which stipulates that in an infinite scattering medium all modes and propagation directions become equally probable at long lapse time in the coda. The objective of this work is to examine quantitatively how this conclusion is affected in an open waveguide geometry, with a particular emphasis on seismological applications. To carry our this task, the problem is recast as a spectral analysis of the radiative transfer equation. Usi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Margerin (2017) derived an equation to calculate Q l −1 : Ql1=cω×l×()1g×τl()H/l where c is the medium velocity, ω is the angular frequency, l ∗ is the mean free path which is the inverse of scattering coefficient ( g ∗ ), g is the anisotropy factor, and τ l is the mean free time which is a function of Moho depth ( H ) normalized by l ∗ . τ l can be approximated using the plot of τ l versus H/l ∗ for rough surfaces provided in Margerin (2017) and g is set to 0 for isotropic scattering. Q l −1 can provide leakage coefficient ( b lk ) as blk=Ql1×ω …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Margerin (2017) derived an equation to calculate Q l −1 : Ql1=cω×l×()1g×τl()H/l where c is the medium velocity, ω is the angular frequency, l ∗ is the mean free path which is the inverse of scattering coefficient ( g ∗ ), g is the anisotropy factor, and τ l is the mean free time which is a function of Moho depth ( H ) normalized by l ∗ . τ l can be approximated using the plot of τ l versus H/l ∗ for rough surfaces provided in Margerin (2017) and g is set to 0 for isotropic scattering. Q l −1 can provide leakage coefficient ( b lk ) as blk=Ql1×ω …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But other studies confirmed analytically or numerically that the P -to-S energy ratio is shifted in the presence of intrinsic attenuation (Margerin et al, 2001;Trégourès and van Tiggelen, 2002a), interfaces (Trégourès and van Tiggelen, 2002a) or sub-surface layering (Margerin et al, 2009). Based on a radiative transfer model for scalar waves in a wavguide geometry, Margerin (2017) shows that the energy flux at the free surface is never isotropic, even at long lapse-time. Hence, while a key concept, the conditions of application of equipartition to seismological data needs to be carefully examined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Therefore, even without absorption the crustal energy can only decrease over time, a phenomenon called energy leakage (Korn, 1990;Margerin et al, 1998). As shown in Margerin et al (1998) and Margerin (2017), one can distinguish two regimes for leakage. In the case of strong scattering in the crust (l * /H 1), the typical leakage time scales like H 2 /(cl * ) (Margerin et al, 1999;Wegler, 2004).…”
Section: Model Presentation and Important Scale Lengthsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, even being presented general interpretations, we do not discard limitations of the techniques and dataset used, neither the methods implemented, which could inhibit a precise identification of underlying processes. Future works should board these issues, including the proper mapping of the multiple scattering, depth-dependence of the seismic scattering, anisotropy, and depth/thickness of the main seismic discontinuities on the thermal estimations (Margerin, 2017;De Siena et al, 2017;Del Pezzo et al, 2018;Sanborn and Cormier, 2018).…”
Section: Uncertainties and Other Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%