2014
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.89.042334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breakdown of surface-code error correction due to coupling to a bosonic bath

Abstract: We consider a surface code suffering decoherence due to coupling to a bath of bosonic modes at finite temperature and study the time available before the unavoidable breakdown of error correction occurs as a function of coupling and bath parameters. We derive an exact expression for the error rate on each individual qubit of the code, taking spatial and temporal correlations between the errors into account. We investigate numerically how different kinds of spatial correlations between errors in the surface cod… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These errors can be corrected in future cycles of error-correction, provided the remaining noise is of a form that a decoder can correct. In general, however, one must worry that large correlated errors can be introduced that adversarially corrupt encoded information 45 46 47 48 49 50 . Such errors may occur in the gauge color code if, for instance, we mistakenly predict two stabilizer defects of the same color that are separated by a large distance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These errors can be corrected in future cycles of error-correction, provided the remaining noise is of a form that a decoder can correct. In general, however, one must worry that large correlated errors can be introduced that adversarially corrupt encoded information 45 46 47 48 49 50 . Such errors may occur in the gauge color code if, for instance, we mistakenly predict two stabilizer defects of the same color that are separated by a large distance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each L n (t) for echo in case of both single-and two-qubit coherences, can be calculated according to Eqs. (12)(13)(14)(15)(16), with Hamiltonian of the environment consisting only of the Zeeman splitting of considered nucleus. When transverse couplings to the qubit are negligible, as in our case, when the whole system is in magnetic field B >100 mT, non-interacting bath of nuclei does not give any contribution to decoherence, i.e., L n (t) = 1.…”
Section: Calculation Of Two-qubit Decoherencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the calculation of each L kl (t), we need to consider qubit(s) interacting with a pair of nuclei k and l and now the Hamiltonian of the environment, as in procedure described in Eqs. (12)(13)(14)(15)(16) contains not only Zeeman splittings of each of the nuclei, but also coupling between them. In this paper, we shall use the dipolar interaction as described in Eq.…”
Section: Calculation Of Two-qubit Decoherencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let the latent probability (correlation) of an error-induced in pairwise with the center and one of four qubits be 0 ≤ p (m * ,n * ),(m,n) ≡ p * 1 ≤ 1/2. In this case, the error probability of the center qubit in subset (N sub1 = 5) is given by the following [13]:…”
Section: Semi-classical Description Of Nonlinear Local Correlated Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%