2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.98.115147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breakdown of topological Thouless pumping in the strongly interacting regime

Abstract: We elucidate the mechanism for instability of topological Thouless pumping in strongly interacting systems from a viewpoint of symmetry-protected topological phases. If the protecting symmetries of the underlying topological phases change between noninteracting fermions and a bosonic system in the strong coupling limit, the symmetry protection argument enforces a gap closing and thereby predicts a breakdown of the topological pumping. We also demonstrate that, even in the weakly interacting regime where the bu… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
43
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
4
43
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The change of the Chern number is clearly seen in our finite-size data and we expect that this U -driven transition should be detectable in a charge-pumping experiment. Different from the fermionic Rice-Mele model [36], we don't observe a breakdown of the charge pump when studying the same quantities as in [36] on finite system sizes. The presence of gapless spin excitations along special points of the pump cycle parameterized by δ may ultimately spoil the quantization of C at large U/t, but we expect that for the first pump cycles that can typically be accessed in a quantum-gas experiment, C, and hence the pumped charge, should remain quantized.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The change of the Chern number is clearly seen in our finite-size data and we expect that this U -driven transition should be detectable in a charge-pumping experiment. Different from the fermionic Rice-Mele model [36], we don't observe a breakdown of the charge pump when studying the same quantities as in [36] on finite system sizes. The presence of gapless spin excitations along special points of the pump cycle parameterized by δ may ultimately spoil the quantization of C at large U/t, but we expect that for the first pump cycles that can typically be accessed in a quantum-gas experiment, C, and hence the pumped charge, should remain quantized.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…This implies that the many-body groundstate must remained gapped, such that an adiabatic limit is well- defined. Therefore, there has been great interest in finding insulating quantum phases for both bosonic [36,[39][40][41][42] and fermionic [35,39] systems. Furthermore, one can also establish an analogy to the spin-Quantum Hall effect by studying families of such 1D Hamiltonians with a spin-dependent optical potential [35,39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following Ref. [30], we study the charge pumping for finite systems with open-boundary conditions by monitoring the polarization P(τ ) of the model (1). The total transferred charge is given by…”
Section: B Pair Pumpingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This concept was first introduced by Thouless [25] and may be studied by the generalization of the SSH to the Rice-Mele (RM) model [26]. Recently, with the observation of charge pumping in cold-atom experiments [4][5][6][7], the fate of Thouless pumping in interacting systems, such as the interacting fermionic or bosonic RM model, has attracted a great deal of interest [27][28][29][30][31][32][33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We expect that this difference originates from the interference effect of the upper band, which is determined by the difference between the lower and upper band instantaneous energy spectrums and the Stokes phase as Eq. (11). Furthermore, it is interesting to compare ∆P (T ), which was introduced in the previous section, with the total pumped charge Q sys of the system.…”
Section: Estimation Of the Lz Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%