“…Plants were monitored weekly for 8 weeks after treatment and then the project lead assigned a numerical value of 0 through 10 to describe visual quality (0 = dead; 5 = fair quality, acceptable, somewhat desirable form and color, little to no chlorosis or necrosis; 10 = excellent quality, perfect condition, healthy and robust, excellent color and form). Although some authors (e.g., Cutelle et al, 2013;Koschnick et al, 2005;Mudge et al, 2007) report visual injury or damage resulting from herbicide treatments, we recorded visual quality, which has also been used to describe plant response to differing culture conditions (e.g., Gettys andMoore, 2018, 2019), herbicides (e.g., Gettys and Haller, 2009, 2010Smith et al, 2014), salt stress (e.g., Tootoonchi et al, 2020), and other experimental factors. After visual scoring, a destructive harvest was conducted to collect all live biomass of floating species and all live aboveground shoots of emergent species.…”