“…In our context this means that there is not necessary a one-to-one relationship between a type of crisis and a type of response, but that the same types of collaborative response can be effective for different types of crisis and vice versa. The crisis typology developed by The International Risk Governance Council (IRGC, 2008; an updated version published by Florin & Bürkler (2017), on the contrary, is more concerned with keeping types of risk issues presented (simple, uncertain, complex, and/or ambiguous) separate from the description of possible designs for risk management strategies ("risk-informed," "robustness-focused", "precaution-based," "resilience-focused," and "discourse-based" strategies) (Jansen, Claassen, van Poll, van Kamp, & Timmermans, 2018). This typology has, however, two other disadvantages in the light of our line of argument.…”