“Breaking Even” under Intensification? Gendered Trade‐Offs for Women Milk Marketers in Kenya*

Abstract

Despite the commonly vaunted "win-win" prospect of combining intensified livestock production with greater gender equality, the benefits of formal marketization of livestock products are generally skewed toward men. In response to this global trend, there is a growing impetus to better understand the gender dynamics underlying women's market participation to curtail the risk of worsening gender inequalities in agricultural systems transitioning to intensified production. This study analyzes the spectrum of women's informal milk market practices in two Kenyan Counties undergoing dairy system intensification. Qualitative data were gathered from dairy stakeholders and market traders to explore the localized system of gender relations mediating women's engagement with milk markets and current practices. Results indicate that increased dairy intensification and informal market use is challenging existing gender norms and disrupting the boundaries between hegemonic (socially acceptable) and pariah (socially disruptive) gender relations. While women are generally better able to control the proceeds from their dairy labor in informal markets, they also face high social culpability and danger from engaging in illicit activities that transgress local norms. These contradictory "win-lose" dynamics and trade-offs highlight the contested nature of gender market relations under agricultural intensification and commercialization currently being pursued under low emissions dairy development (LEDD) in Kenya. The risk of exacerbating existing gender inequalities has profound implications for LEDD and agricultural intensification more broadly.

Nested Scales of Sustainable Livelihoods: Gendered Perspectives on Small-Scale Dairy Development in Kenya

“…It is very hard because people go through short-cut routes [and sell to hawkers]. (Site C, HH1, woman) However, as some studies have shown, some local milk buyers are also women who depend on this small trade for their livelihoods [41,42]. Dairy development programs, however, often do not promote a variety of milk selling channels but privilege the large processors.…”

Hitting the target and missing the point? On the risks of measuring women’s empowerment in agricultural development

“…While many women's empowerment metrics perpetuates the notion that gender is merely a property of atomized individuals, who are independent of other actors, contemporary gender theory sees gender as relational (Hackfort and Burchardt 2018;Jerneck 2018;Risman et al 2018;Leslie et al 2019). Gender gains meaning through social practices that structure hierarchies of gendered power in given contexts (Tavenner et al 2020). This hierarchy is shaped by localized notions of socially desirable/acceptable masculinities and femininities (Schippers 2007) and sex disaggregated survey data does not capture how gender is mediated by societal relations and structures.…”

Exploration of gender dynamics in the production and marketing of forage technologies in Kenya

“…Some of the documented pathways to realize WE through livestock production include women's livestock ownership and management; women's participation in the livestock market and the commercialization of live animals, animal products, and animal inputs; and the opportunity for women to control and make decisions over these products and over the income generated from their sale (Njuki & Sanginga, 2013). For example, women often sell surplus eggs and milk and control the generated revenues, which they can use to meet their own or their household's needs (Njuki and Sanginga, 2013;Tavenner et al, 2021).…”