2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtener.2022.101087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breaking OER and CER scaling relations via strain and its relaxation in RuO2 (101)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, under tensile strain AEM activity decreases and LOM activity improves. This theoretical finding appears to be consistent with the experimental observation of pH dependence for unstrained RuO 2 suggesting some contribution of LOM and the lack of thereof in strained RuO 2 suggesting that the major contribution comes from the AEM mechanism [38] …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, under tensile strain AEM activity decreases and LOM activity improves. This theoretical finding appears to be consistent with the experimental observation of pH dependence for unstrained RuO 2 suggesting some contribution of LOM and the lack of thereof in strained RuO 2 suggesting that the major contribution comes from the AEM mechanism [38] …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This theoretical finding appears to be consistent with the experimental observation of pH dependence for unstrained RuO 2 suggesting some contribution of LOM and the lack of thereof in strained RuO 2 suggesting that the major contribution comes from the AEM mechanism. [38] We further find that there is a clear correlation between the shifts of the O-2p band center as a function of applied strain for the O cus and O lat sites and OER activity (see Figure 3). Specifically, we observe that with increasing strain, the O cus -2p band centers become lower in energy indicating that the O cus atoms should be less OER active.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…In particular, the peaks at binding energies (BEs) of 462.7 and 484.7 eV are assigned to Ru(IV), while the two peaks at 465.2 and 487.1 eV are ascribed to Ru(III). 37 Interestingly, the binding energy of the Li-doped RuO 2 sample exhibited a slight XPS peak shift toward the lower energy direction in comparison with that of pristine RuO 2 , reflecting the change in electronic configuration and the existence of electronic interactions between each element after Li doping (Fig. 2b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…products at the RuOx surface as a function of J was investigated (35). The selectivity towards iron plating, ηFe, was >94 % for J ≤ 200 mA cm -2 (Figure 4A) and ηFe decreased to 87% at 300 mA cm -2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%