Breaking Patterns? How Female Scientists Negotiate their Token Role in their Life Stories

Abstract

Building upon token theory, this paper analyses coping behaviours of women in Science, Engineering and Technology (SET) through a professional identity perspective. It proposes that female scientists need to negotiate and balance conflicting aspects of their professional and gender identities throughout their career. A reconstructive biography analysis of Leitmotif and Gestalt of 15 life stories reveals that gender is the structuring element of the female scientists' self-presentation. The paper presents two key cases which exemplify two alternative coping strategies: the women either use a similarity strategy, relying on full assimilation to the masculine norms in SET, or a difference strategy, highlighting their otherness and their struggle for equality. The in-depth analysis reveals that both strategies cannot 'break patterns', but instead leave the dominance of masculine norms in SET unchallenged. Implications of these findings are discussed.

Contradictions concerning care: Female surgeons' accounts of the repression and resurfacing of care in their profession

“…Webster et al, 2016). This resonates with research on women in other STEMM fields, for example, several studies of women in science and engineering (Faulkner, 2009;Haas, Koeszegi, & Zedlacher, 2016;Hatmaker, 2013;Rhoton, 2011;Rodriguez, 2013) have shown how they are called upon to "justify their presence" (p. 400) because their occupation is considered to be 'gender in/authentic' (Faulkner, 2009), due to the persistent gendered binary between technical and social skills and the masculine-typing of the occupation. As a consequence, regardless of their qualifications, seniority and experience, in interactions with others, their presence may be contested and 'misrecognised' (e.g.…”

‘Not one of the family’: Gender and precarious work in the neoliberal university

“…Of these, 125 were women and 56 were men. The majority of respondents (78 per cent) worked in the fields of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences, namely those assumed to be less inhospitable to women compared to science and engineering (Haas, Koeszegi, & Zedlacher, ). Most respondents seized this opportunity to tell us their stories, with answers often over several hundred words.…”

Career experiences of women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics fields: A systematic literature review

“…A total of 13 theories, theoretical frameworks, or conceptual models were specified in the 28 studies. Among them, gender and feminist theories were most frequently cited in six studies (Allen, Armstrong, Riemenschneider, & Reid, 2006;Haas, Koeszegi, & Zedlacher, 2016;Miller, 2004;Powell, Bagilhole, & Dainty, 2009;Rhoton, 2011;Watts, 2009), followed by social cognitive career theory in four studies (Buse, Bilimoria, & Perelli, 2013;Fouad, Singh, Cappaert, Chang, & Wan, 2016;S. A. Nolan, Buckner, Marzabadi, & Kuck, 2008;Singh et al, 2013), and social construction theory in three studies (Adya, 2008;Crump, Logan, & McIlroy, 2007;Martin, Wright, Beaven, & Matlay, 2015).…”