2015
DOI: 10.1187/cbe.14-12-0222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breaking the Cycle: Future Faculty Begin Teaching with Learner-Centered Strategies after Professional Development

Abstract: The authors investigated the extent to which postdoctoral fellows believed in and implemented evidence-based pedagogies after completion of a 2-yr professional development program, FIRST IV. Postdocs reported greater use of learner-centered compared with teacher-centered instruction, and video ratings further documented learner-centered instruction.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
104
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
3
104
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To support instructional change, faculty clearly need more than just knowledge of effective teaching strategies. They also need motivation, support, critical reflection, and concrete suggestions for improvement (Gormally et al ., 2014; Bradford and Miller, 2015; Ebert-May et al ., 2015). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To support instructional change, faculty clearly need more than just knowledge of effective teaching strategies. They also need motivation, support, critical reflection, and concrete suggestions for improvement (Gormally et al ., 2014; Bradford and Miller, 2015; Ebert-May et al ., 2015). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis described above follows the RTOP analysis described in the RTOP reference manual [47], previous RTOP studies [16,[49][50][51], and other educational studies [52][53][54]. While this method provides a succinct summary of the quantitative data collected during each observation, it overlooks a key feature of this type of data.…”
Section: Alternative Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RTOP was originally developed as part of an evaluation system for a program designed for preparing K-12 teachers. Since its development, it has also been used to track changes in undergraduate faculty practices due to participation in different types of professional development (Ebert-May et al, 2015;Manduca et al, 2017). A survey of studies on high school STEM teachers indicates that average RTOP scores range from 37.3 to 53.5 (Roehrig and Kruse, 2005;Yezierski and Herrington, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%