“…In closing, I believe the concept of White dialectics is a useful framework that adds greatly to our understanding of White racial identity development (Helms, 1995), Whiteness (Sue, 2004), White privilege (McIntosh, 2002), the psychosocial costs of racism to Whites (Spanierman, Poteat, Beer, & Armstrong, 2006), and why aversive racism thrives in an environment of naiveté and invisibility (Dovidio & Gaertner, 2000). The White dialectics proposed by Todd and Abrams are consistent with findings in the research literature (Sue et al, 2010;Utsey et al, 2005), theorizing by racial identity scholars (Helms, 1995), observations by educators and trainers in the field of race relations (Sanchez-Hucles & Jones, 2005), and the experiential reality of people of color (Sue, 2003). I again compliment Todd and Abrams for a fine example of qualitative research and believe that their White dialectic formulation constitutes an important contribution to the research, education, and training literature.…”