2017 International Artificial Intelligence and Data Processing Symposium (IDAP) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/idap.2017.8090347
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breast cancer classification with wavelet neural network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many researchers worked on a multiresolution analysis of mammograms based on wavelets transform by using different types of wavelet family and feature spaces. Ucar and Kocer (2017) used Wavelet Neural Network (WNN) and classical Neural Network in normal and abnormal classification. The best estimated result of WNN is 98.90%.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many researchers worked on a multiresolution analysis of mammograms based on wavelets transform by using different types of wavelet family and feature spaces. Ucar and Kocer (2017) used Wavelet Neural Network (WNN) and classical Neural Network in normal and abnormal classification. The best estimated result of WNN is 98.90%.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ergin et al (2016) obtained an accuracy value of 72.39% using 322 database FLDA classifier. In addition, Ucar and Kocer (2017) used Wavelet for feature extraction method and ANN classifier obtained an accuracy value of 95.49%. Putra (2018) using 2D DWT+ LBP obtained accuracy values of 92.1% with sensitivity value (Sn) of 91% and Specificity value of (Sp) 94%.…”
Section: Comparison Of Normal and Abnormal Classifications Performancementioning
confidence: 99%