EditorialScreening is one of the most important parts of preventive public health, which enables cancer detection while the disease is still asymptomatic. Diagnosis of cancer at asymptomatic and/or in situ stage increases survival, and preserves effected organs and quality of life. Screening can be successful if the method is adopted by the target population, is easy to implement, has few adverse effects, and reduces cancer-related morbidity and mortality. Additionally, the screening method should be feasible to the economic, social and cultural structure of the country in which it is implemented. In this editorial, I give my perspective on recent debates about breast cancer screening, based on our own experience from "Bahçeşehir Breast Cancer Population-Based Screening Program" and knowledge of the research literature.Mammography screening has all the features listed above, and has been applied as a screening method for more than 50 years with proven efficacy in reducing mortality (1). With this test, the rates of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and Stage I invasive breast cancer have reached 20-25% and 50-60%, respectively (1-3). Randomized clinical trials showed that by using screening mammography; the rate of early-stage breast cancer (stages 0 and I) and the chance of breast conservation increased, whereas the mortality rate decreased (1-10).An ongoing debate has continued for the last 20-25 years on the harms of screening mammography such as false positive findings, overdiagnosis and unnecessary treatment rather than its benefits (1-2, 5, 8, 10). These publications lack fundamental scientific support, which has lead to confusion in women and health care providers, particularly in developing countries such as Turkey. Mammography screening is not nationwide, and there are very limited organized population-based screening programs (such as Bahceşehir Mammography Screening Project) in Turkey due to low awareness on breast cancer in healthcare providers and the targeted population, inadequate and incomplete screening centers, and low compliance with regular mammography screening, Negative talk on the televison and negative articles and columns in newspapers on screening mammography by non-expert physicians and health reports cause adverse effects on mammographic screening and decrease opportunistic and organized screening. Unfortunately, these have achieved a high profile in the mass media and stimulated further debate.