The paradigm shift in breast cancer biology has changed the management of breast cancer from radical mastectomy to precision medicine. In the late 19 th century, William Steward Halsted thought that breast cancer was a local-regional disease, and he proposed radical mastectomy, which became the standard surgical treatment of breast cancer for nearly 100 years (1). Halsted succeeded in decreasing the locoregional recurrence rate to 6% at 5 years in contrast to his European counterparts, whose local recurrence rates ranged from 50 to 80% (2). Despite the decrease in local recurrence rate, radical mastectomy did not improve survival rate in comparison to lesser surgical procedures. Bernard Fisher's alternative paradigm championed an emergence of breast cancer as a systemic disease in 1970s (3-4). He considered that breast cancer was a systemic disease at the outset as a consequence of cells entering lymphatics, but also into the blood via communications. According to this hypothesis, systemic treatment became a substantial part of breast cancer management, and multidisciplinary approaches were required for a more effective treatment. Prospective randomized clinical studies of the 1970s and 1980s (NSABP B04, NSABP B06, MILAN I study, etc.) supported Fisher's hypothesis -variations in the extent of local therapy such as simple mastectomy, quadrantectomy or wide tumour excision plus whole-breast radiation therapy yielded no significant differences in survival outcomes (5-7). Both Halstedian and Fisherian Hypotheses recommended one treatment protocol (radical mastectomy or systemic treatment±radiation therapy) to all patients with breast cancer (one size fits all). Since these two old hypotheses did not separate low-risk patients from highrisk patients, overtreatment was a major problem for patients with low-risk breast cancer. Today, we accept the intermediate paradigm that is combination of Halstedian and Fisherian hypotheses. Rising breast cancer awareness and mammographic screening have increased early-stage breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ rates. Almost half of these patients have good prognostic factors and do not require systemic treatment and/or radiation therapy. Patients diagnosed via screening mammography have better prognostic factors than symptomatic breast cancer patients. Systemic treatment and radiation therapy have very harmful side effects despite of their life saving benefits (8). They are also expensive and impose an economic burden on the health care system (9).
Paradigm Shift From Halstedian Radical Mastectomy to Personalized MedicineVahit Özmen Department of General Surgery, İstanbul University İstanbul Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey J Breast Health 2017; 13: 50-53 DOI: 10.5152/tjbh.2017.312017 ABSTRACT Breast cancer management changed from radical mastectomy to precision medicine in a period longer than a century. The aims of these changes were to refrain from overdiagnoses and overtreatments as well as their harmful side effects and extra costs. Breast cancer is a heterogen...