2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10278-015-9777-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breast Density Analysis Using an Automatic Density Segmentation Algorithm

Abstract: Breast density is a strong risk factor for breast cancer. In this paper, we present an automated approach for breast density segmentation in mammographic images based on a supervised pixel-based classification and using textural and morphological features. The objective of the paper is not only to show the feasibility of an automatic algorithm for breast density segmentation but also to prove its potential application to the study of breast density evolution in longitudinal studies. The database used here cont… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that, to minimise bias, these comparisons are based on only those studies that have used the MIAS database [15], four-class classification, and using the same evaluation technique as in this study. Our method outperformed the methods in [3,4,[7][8][9][10][11][12] because (a) robust feature extraction operators are used which are able to capture richer micro-structure information using the three-value encoding technique and are less sensitive to noise, (b) the use of F GD roi minimises the texture similarity representation of the breast region hence resulting in more descriptive features across different BI-RADS classes, and (c) we are able to capture a wider range of texture rotation/variation by extracting features from eight different orientations. In breast imaging, deep learning based approaches are becoming popular due to its capability to learn complex appearances especially in the area of segmentation and classification.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Note that, to minimise bias, these comparisons are based on only those studies that have used the MIAS database [15], four-class classification, and using the same evaluation technique as in this study. Our method outperformed the methods in [3,4,[7][8][9][10][11][12] because (a) robust feature extraction operators are used which are able to capture richer micro-structure information using the three-value encoding technique and are less sensitive to noise, (b) the use of F GD roi minimises the texture similarity representation of the breast region hence resulting in more descriptive features across different BI-RADS classes, and (c) we are able to capture a wider range of texture rotation/variation by extracting features from eight different orientations. In breast imaging, deep learning based approaches are becoming popular due to its capability to learn complex appearances especially in the area of segmentation and classification.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In conclusion, we have presented and developed a breast density classification method using the LTP operators applied only within the fibroglandular disk area which is the most prominent region of the breast instead of the whole breast region as suggested in current studies [2][3][4][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. By only extracting features from this area, we obtained a set of more discriminative and distinctive texture descriptors across BI-RADS classes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations