2021
DOI: 10.1111/tbj.14160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breast fat necrosis secondary to warfarin‐induced calciphylaxis, a rare mimicker of breast cancer: A case report and a review of literature

Abstract: Breast fat necrosis (BFN) is usually a benign inflammatory response to breast trauma. However, an extremely rare cause of fat necrosis is calciphylaxis, a calcification of small‐ and medium‐sized arteries causing thrombosis and ischemia. It is classified into (A) uremic (B) nonuremic‐induced calciphylaxis. Calciphylaxis has been reported to be encountered in different parts of the body. However, to the best of our knowledge there is only one case in the English literature of BFN 2ry to warfarin‐induced calciph… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As with every systematic review, there is a lack of comprehensive information, potential selection, publishing biases, and a controlled method to reporting in this one. Though NUC has become more widely recognized in recent years, a lack of understanding of the disease, as evidenced by patients' lack of awareness of the disease, may have resulted in under-recognition and, [60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68] as a result, confidential reporting of the disease, limiting the representativeness of this systematic review. In addition, we did not disclose attempting to contact the authors of original reports to collect missing data (e.g., time to death, laboratory parameters, histopathologic confirmation, or bone scans), which may lead to some of the stated words being "associated" with the NUC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As with every systematic review, there is a lack of comprehensive information, potential selection, publishing biases, and a controlled method to reporting in this one. Though NUC has become more widely recognized in recent years, a lack of understanding of the disease, as evidenced by patients' lack of awareness of the disease, may have resulted in under-recognition and, [60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68] as a result, confidential reporting of the disease, limiting the representativeness of this systematic review. In addition, we did not disclose attempting to contact the authors of original reports to collect missing data (e.g., time to death, laboratory parameters, histopathologic confirmation, or bone scans), which may lead to some of the stated words being "associated" with the NUC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advanced radiological technologies have provided new insights and valuable clues for calciphylaxis diagnosis. In-depth studies of various imaging techniques, such as molybdenum target [ 43 , 44 ], ultrasonography [ 7 , 45 ], and magnetic resonance imaging, are vital for future research. The application of multiple imaging techniques in clinical practice to screen high-risk patients can also provide a basis for determining whether to conduct further invasive pathological examination of skin biopsy.…”
Section: Imaging Examinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Breast fat necrosis (BFN) is usually considered a benign inflammatory response to breast trauma. AlQattan et al [23] reported the case of a 65-year-old woman with atrial fibrillation who took warfarin. Examination of the histopathology revealed fat necrosis caused by calcification.…”
Section: Calcification Of Breast Arteries Induced By Warfarinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AlQattan et al . [ 23 ] reported the case of a 65-year-old woman with atrial fibrillation who took warfarin. Examination of the histopathology revealed fat necrosis caused by calcification.…”
Section: Calcification Induced By Warfarinmentioning
confidence: 99%