1999
DOI: 10.2105/ajph.89.1.25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breast-feeding and infant illness: a dose-response relationship?

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine whether breast-feeding has a dose-related protective effect against illness and whether it confers special health benefits to poor infants. METHODS: The association between breast-feeding dose and illnesses in the first 6 months of life was analyzed with generalized estimating equations regression for 7092 infants from the National Maternal and Infant Health Survey. Breast-feeding dose (ratio of breast-feedings to other feedings) was categorized as full, m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

7
144
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 210 publications
(155 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
7
144
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent or 'pooled' estimates are from Raisler 49 and Scariati et al, 48 Uhari and Mantysaar i, 36 Peat 47 and Gdalevich et al 38 for gastrointestinal illness, acute otitis media, respiratory illness (asthma), and eczema respectively. High estimates are from Popkin and Adair, 72 Saarinen, 29 Wright et al, 73 Saarinen 28 and Lucas and Cole 46 respectively.…”
Section: Policy -Practice Gapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent or 'pooled' estimates are from Raisler 49 and Scariati et al, 48 Uhari and Mantysaar i, 36 Peat 47 and Gdalevich et al 38 for gastrointestinal illness, acute otitis media, respiratory illness (asthma), and eczema respectively. High estimates are from Popkin and Adair, 72 Saarinen, 29 Wright et al, 73 Saarinen 28 and Lucas and Cole 46 respectively.…”
Section: Policy -Practice Gapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High estimates are from Popkin and Adair, 72 Saarinen, 29 Wright et al, 73 Saarinen 28 and Lucas and Cole 46 respectively. 38 and a relative risk of 1.8 for gastrointestinal illness; 48,49 and 'lower bound' and 'upper bound' estimates from Table 3. The attributable hospitalisation cost of 60% of infants not breastfeeding in the ACT falls to $0.61 million and $0.62 million for the 'pooled' and lower bound estimates respectively.…”
Section: Policy -Practice Gapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are various known benefits of BF (Brown et al, 1989;Popkin et al, 1990;Victora et al, 1994;Heinig & Dewey, 1996;Labbok et al, 1997;Pérez-Escamilla, 1997;Anderson et al, 1999;Labbok, 1999), which make these high rates desirable. Breast milk provides nutrients to meet growth needs (Cohen et al, 1994;Dewey et al, 1999;Simondon and Simondon, 1997) and several immunological factors to protect against infections and subsequent mortality (Beaudry et al, 1995;Raisler et al, 1999;Kramer et al, 2001;WHO, 2001). In light of these benefits, not BF is considered a real threat for infant survival in developing country settings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22, no. 1 (Spring 2007) effects for older children (Perera and others 1999;Raisler, Alexander, and O'Compo 1999;WHO Collaborative Study Team 2000). Weaning foods prepared in unhygienic conditions are frequently heavily contaminated with pathogens, and are thus a cause of diarrhea and associated malnutrition (Motarjemi and others 1993;Hendricks and Badruddin 1994;Monte and others 1997;Lanata 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%