2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1526-9523(03)00280-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breast Implants and Breast Cancer Screening

Abstract: Concern about breast prostheses impairing breast cancer detection has become a priority issue. This article provides a review of the literature on the influence of implants on early detection methods of breast cancer, specifically breast self-examination (BSE), clinical breast examination (CBE), and mammography. Background information on implants is presented, including indications for surgery, types of prostheses, location of placement, and associated complications. Conclusions from the literature suggest tha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Breast implants pose a particular problem when evaluating female patients for the presence of heart disease or breast cancer [10,13]. They can be a significant source of radiotracer attenuation during myocardial SPECT imaging, and they can also make imaging of the heart by other means such as echocardiography more difficult.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Breast implants pose a particular problem when evaluating female patients for the presence of heart disease or breast cancer [10,13]. They can be a significant source of radiotracer attenuation during myocardial SPECT imaging, and they can also make imaging of the heart by other means such as echocardiography more difficult.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…65 The amount of parenchymal breast tissue obscured at mammography by the implant is known to be between 22% and 83%. 66 Insufficient compression of the breast to visualize the parenchyma and the production of implant related artifacts on the film can also make interpretation of mammographic examinations difficult in women with augmented breasts. 28 29 Additionally, capsular contracture, which develops in about 15-20% of women with implants, has been shown to reduce mammographic sensitivity by 30-50%.…”
Section: Possible Explanations For Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 10 17 20 The breast implants could serve as a base against which the mass may be more likely to be differentiated. 73 This suggests that tumors of equal size may be more easily palpated in patients with implants, especially for implants placed in the subglandular position, 66 and this may compensate somewhat for the potential impairment of mammography. However, very few studies have evaluated this question, providing no conclusive results.…”
Section: Possible Explanations For Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possible explanation is that subglandular implants, because of their proximity with breast tissue, could serve as a base against which the mass may be easier to feel at breast examination and be more palpable compared with women with submuscular implant placement (33,58). This may compensate for the potential impairment in visualization (59,60). However, this explanation needs to be further confirmed (29,30,34).…”
Section: Principal Findings and Comparison With Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%