2021
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breast lesion detection through MammoWave device: Empirical detection capability assessment of microwave images’ parameters

Abstract: MammoWave is a microwave imaging device for breast lesions detection, which operates using two (azimuthally rotating) antennas without any matching liquid. Images, subsequently obtained by resorting to Huygens Principle, are intensity maps, representing the homogeneity of tissues’ dielectric properties. In this paper, we propose to generate, for each breast, a set of conductivity weighted microwave images by using different values of conductivity in the Huygens Principle imaging algorithm. Next, microwave imag… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
41
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
4
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When ideal skin suppression is used, as displayed in Figure 3a, no beamformer has a practical sensitivity. If adipose and fibroglandular reference subtraction is performed, the beamformers have improved performance that is within the range of reported sensitivity estimates in the literature (74-100% in [8,9,[32][33][34][35][36][37]). The specificity of the DAS and DMAS beamformers was observed to be worse than a random classifier acting on images of healthy breasts.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When ideal skin suppression is used, as displayed in Figure 3a, no beamformer has a practical sensitivity. If adipose and fibroglandular reference subtraction is performed, the beamformers have improved performance that is within the range of reported sensitivity estimates in the literature (74-100% in [8,9,[32][33][34][35][36][37]). The specificity of the DAS and DMAS beamformers was observed to be worse than a random classifier acting on images of healthy breasts.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The other study estimated the specificity to be 20% and estimated the specificity using five phantoms [32]. Neither estimates were promising, and while the sensitivity of BMS has been estimated in several publications and has been reported to be between 74% and 100% [8,9,[32][33][34][35][36][37], insufficient attention has been awarded to the specificity of the modality, which must be considered in tandem with the sensitivity.…”
Section: The Diagnostic Performance Of Das Dmas and Orrmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The sensitivity in malignant lesions was 59%. Their device was also stationary and the sensitivity to malignancy was not 100% [ 24 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most significant problem is that microwave imaging produces an image with limited spatial resolution [65][66][67]. Microwave tomography and radar-based imaging are the two main types of microwave imaging [68,69].…”
Section: Microwave Imaging-based Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%