2007
DOI: 10.1007/bf03033997
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breast MRI and18F FDG PET/CT in the management of breast cancer

Abstract: As expected, BMRI is more sensitive than PET/CT in the detection of breast lesions. However, PET/CT as a whole-body examination changed the management of disease by detection of distant lesions in 6 of the 21 patients. Our study suggests that 18F FDG PET/CT and BMRI should be considered as complimentary imaging tools in the pre- and postoperative work-up of patients diagnosed with breast cancer.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well-established that 18 F-FDG PET imaging is a powerful tool for assisting in the diagnosis, staging, and monitoring of therapy response for a variety of neoplastic processes, including breast cancer (23,24). One of the main limitations of the current use of PET imaging is that our standard practice of preoperative image acquisition at the time of the original evaluation of the patient cannot be translated into real-time information for availability in the …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well-established that 18 F-FDG PET imaging is a powerful tool for assisting in the diagnosis, staging, and monitoring of therapy response for a variety of neoplastic processes, including breast cancer (23,24). One of the main limitations of the current use of PET imaging is that our standard practice of preoperative image acquisition at the time of the original evaluation of the patient cannot be translated into real-time information for availability in the …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pathologic sampling or follow-up imaging results were used as confi rmation in all cases. 40 Details of these cases, including the presence or absence of other features that might have suggested metastasis, are not available. A prospective study comparing FDG-PET for inbreast and systemic staging with chest x-ray, liver ultrasound, mammography, and bone scan noted a greater sensitivity of FDG-PET in inbreast staging for detecting malignant lesions, in detecting multifocality, and in correctly identifying metastatic disease in seven patients, with no false-positives or false-negatives found in 117 cases.…”
Section: Evaluating For Distant Metastasismentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For example, when combining MRI and PET, we can exploit the best of each modality's characteristics to better understand both normal tissue behavior and tumor response to treatment. A few studies have investigated the use of combined MRI and PET to monitor and assess residual disease in locally advanced breast cancer during PST (41,51,(57)(58)(59)(60)(61). In these studies, there were significant decreases in the MRI and SUV metrics in responders compared with nonresponders.…”
Section: Multiparametric and Multimodality Imaging Of Treatment Respomentioning
confidence: 99%