2023
DOI: 10.1007/s13770-023-00528-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breast Tissue Reconstruction Using Polycaprolactone Ball Scaffolds in a Partial Mastectomy Pig Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is largely due to the porous structure of our scaffolds, which was large enough to encourage tissue integration rather than peripheral fibrous capsule formation [34]. This contrasts with other studies using implants with smaller pores, which have resulted in peripheral fibrous encapsulation [17,18,28]. In addition, we identified that the scaffold FBR resulted in a rich ECM network containing blood vessels, essentially creating an internal vascularized structure around mPCL struts, allowing for tissue regeneration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is largely due to the porous structure of our scaffolds, which was large enough to encourage tissue integration rather than peripheral fibrous capsule formation [34]. This contrasts with other studies using implants with smaller pores, which have resulted in peripheral fibrous encapsulation [17,18,28]. In addition, we identified that the scaffold FBR resulted in a rich ECM network containing blood vessels, essentially creating an internal vascularized structure around mPCL struts, allowing for tissue regeneration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In contrast, scaffolds filled with 50 mL of autologous fat graft regenerated 59.5 ± 4.6 mL (95% CI), representing a modest 20% increase in soft tissue, but this did not account for potential fat graft resorption, which may increase that gain. In other large animal studies, Shim et al [ 28 ] were also able to regenerate de-novo soft tissue utilizing empty PCL scaffolds designed in a ball-like shape in four pigs over three months. However, their scaffolds were significantly smaller (3 cm in diameter equating to 14 mL volume) compared to our volumes (100 mL), limiting their clinical applicability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is largely due to the porous structure of our scaffold which was large enough to encourage tissue integration, rather than peripheral fibrous capsule formation [32]. This contrasts with other studies using implants with smaller pores resulting in peripheral fibrous encapsulation [17,18,26]. In addition, we identified the scaffold FBR resulted in a rich ECM network containing blood vessels, essentially creating an internal vascularized structure around mPCL struts allowing for tissue regeneration.…”
Section: Groupsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In contrast, scaffolds filled with 50 ml of autologous fat graft regenerated 59.5  4.6 mL (95% CI), representing a modest 20% increase in soft tissue, but this did not account for potential fat graft resorption which may increase that gain. In other large animal studies, Shim et al [26] were also able to regenerate de-novo soft tissue utilizing empty PCL scaffolds designed in a ball-like shape in four pigs over three months. However, their scaffolds were significantly smaller (3cm in diameter equating to 14 ml volume) compared to our volumes (100 ml), limiting their clinical applicability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%