Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy, Personal Well-Being and Related Factors in Pregnant Women Living in a District of Istanbul

Abstract

In this study, we examined breastfeeding self-efficacy levels, well-being and sociodemographic factors in pregnant women. The population of this descriptive study consisted of women with a pregnancy of 27 weeks or more in the Sultanbeyli district of Istanbul, Türkiye. A questionnaire was administered via telephone calls to pregnant women aged 18 years and older. The first part of the questionnaire included questions regarding breastfeeding history and sociodemographic information. The second part included the Prenatal Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale, and the last part included the Personal Well-Being Scale. Higher scale scores indicate higher levels of self-efficacy and well-being. In total, 385 women participated in the study. The median age of the pregnant women was 28.0 years (18.0–43.0). The median gestational week was 33.0 (27.0–42.0). Among women who had received breastfeeding counseling, those with a higher level of knowledge about breastfeeding had higher breastfeeding self-efficacy (p < 0.05). Women with better economic status also had higher well-being scores (p < 0.05). There was a positive correlation between well-being and breastfeeding self-efficacy approaching the statistical significance level (p = 0.052). It is important to consider factors that may be associated with women’s well-being and self-efficacy.

Improvement of Breastfeeding Efficacy Through Small Group Education of Cadres with Pregnant Women

“…Interventions to promote exclusive breastfeeding should therefore be emphasised, without ignoring social inequalities and the need to bridge the knowledge gap on breastfeeding practices. These aspects should be considered as integral components of any comprehensive strategy aimed at promoting and supporting breastfeeding practices through various interventions, educational programmes and services such as breastfeeding counselling, leading to substantial improvements in nutritional, immunological, psychosocial and economic conditions (Değer et al, 2023).…”