F o r m o r e t h a n 2 5 y e a r s , m a g n e t i c r e s o n a n c e cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) has been part of the standard protocol of abdominal MR imaging when a pancreatic or a biliary disease was suspected [1]. Different and complementary approaches, all using two-dimensional (2D) sequences, were initially developed for the assessment of the pancreatic duct and biliary tract with MRCP [1]: a thick slab single-shot fast spin-echo (SSFSE) T2-weighted sequence and a multisection thin-slab, single-shot TSE T2-weighted sequence [1]. Both sequences have many advantages since they provide an excellent selective display of the whole extrahepatic biliary tract and pancreatic duct with few respiratory artefacts, few susceptibility effects and good in-plane resolution and are still in use in many reference centres [1]. However, these sequences have also some drawbacks: motion artefacts, including respiratory, may produce misregistration of thin-slice MRCP images, which may result in areas of missed anatomy. Thick-slab MR imaging is operator-dependent and even when examinations are technically relevant, inherent in-plane volume averaging effect may obscure small stones or anatomic variants [2]. For these reasons, many authors have advocated the use of three-dimensional (3D) MRCP sequences [2]. The theoretical main advantages of 3D MRCP compared to 2D MRCP sequences include: (1) acquisition of contiguous sections that may be used to reconstruct images in any projection, yielding the anatomical overview normally provided with thick-slab 2D images, (2) better spatial resolution with thinner imaging section and better signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and (3) acquisition of all slices with a single coronal volume placed over the biliary tree and pancreatic ducts without need to obtain rotating oblique 2D SSFSE thick-slab planes [2,3].Interestingly, most initial publications focusing on 3D MRCP technique used breath-holding acquisition sequences [2,4]. However, these initial sequences suffered from decreased spatial resolution and acquired non-isotropic voxel datasets [2]. Consequently, for the last 10 years, 3D MRCP sequences have been performed principally with a respiratorytriggered technique for the purpose of obtaining highresolution isotropic images. However, the acquisition time of the respiratory-triggered 3D MRCP sequence has been a clinical burden with a mean time often superior to 5 min despite the use of parallel acquisition technique [5]. Such a long acquisition time is often associated with poor image quality due to motion artefacts. For these reasons, there was a clinical need to decrease the acquisition time of the 3D MRCP sequence while keeping high spatial resolution. The works of Nam et al [6] and Yoshida et al [7] are opening new perspectives in the field of 3D-MRCP. Both studies evaluated the clinical feasibility and clinical usefulness of the gradient and spin-echo (GRASE) sequence with a single breath-hold in 3-T MRCP in comparison to the conventional 3D respirator...