Brecht As Director

Abstract

Much has been written about Brecht in this country, some—though not enough—of his theoretical writings have been translated, and most of his plays have been published in English. From all of this, people quite naturally get the idea that Brecht was primarily a poet and playwright. But, although this is true, in order to understand Brecht the playwright one ought to know Brecht as a man of practical theatre—as a director. Brecht's influence on the theatre of his time stems mainly from the productions he created at the Berliner Ensemble; Germany's theatre has changed totally since he did his exemplary work during the early and mid-fifties in East Berlin. The new movement in England— The Royal Court, Peter Brook and Peter Hall, Kenneth Tynan, to mention a few names only—would probably have been vastly different if the Berliner Ensemble had not presented his work in London in 1956, and again in the sixties, and Giorgio Strehler in Italy and Roger Planchon in France have been deeply influenced by what, and how, Brecht created in Berlin. Though Brecht had worked for the theatre nearly all his life, as a critic first, then as a playwright and director, it was not until 1949 that he found a permanent place for his experiments, a company, and later a building, which he could form into the ideal instrument for his ideas, a theatre which was a laboratory, a place for investigation, analysis, and construction of models.

The Videotaped Addiction Challenge Tool: a new instrument for qualitative substance abuse assessment, treatment planning and research in therapeutic communities

“…A fundamental principle of the modernist period is that, in order to scientifically study the world of meaning, we must strive to understand the phenomena of everyday experience from the point of view of those concerned (Weber, 1968;Schoorl, in Rispens, Carlier & Schoorl, 1988). This existential phenomenological approach challenges the monopoly of objectivity (Luipen, 1971).…”

A Sociocultural Approach To Mind: Some Theoretical Considerations

“…Since the time of Weber (1968Weber ( , 1978 and Marx (1977), a great deal of social theory has been devoted to examining processes such as rationalization (Weber, 1968;Habermas, 1984), reification (Lukacs, 1971), and the emergence of commodity fetishism (Marx, 1977). In the case of each of these constructs the general point is that the functioning of large scale bureaucratic.…”

The city as a political community

“…To the extent that the residents believe their city to possess values that they share in common and that make them willing to work together to seek solutions, the city has the potential of becoming an actively shared polity. What Weber (1956Weber ( /1968) (and the Greek philosophers before him) saw was that the hallmark of the city was its character as a polity, a shared institution that could give a human direction to the course of events and, as much as possible, could take humankind out of the state of nature to which it was otherwise condemned. For those cities that have seen the forces of the market lead to disastrous consequences, the rediscovery of the virtue of a polity may now be a possibility.…”