1996
DOI: 10.1016/0922-338x(96)87585-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breeding a fermentative yeast at high temperature using protoplast fusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These parental strains can be from the same species, but often a Saccharomyces strain is combined with a nonconventional yeast displaying a specific trait, such as lactose utilization (Taya et al ., 1984; Farahnak et al ., 1986; Krishnamoorthy et al ., 2010; Guo et al ., 2012), temperature tolerance (Sakanaka et al ., 1996), osmotolerance (Spencer et al ., 1985; Loray et al ., 1995; Lucca et al ., 2002), starch degradation (Kishida et al ., 1996), killer activity (Gunge & Sakaguchi, 1981), malic acid degradation (Carrau et al ., 1994), or (hemi)cellulose hydrolysate utilization (Pina et al ., 1986; Heluane et al ., 1993; Table1). …”
Section: Natural and Artificial Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These parental strains can be from the same species, but often a Saccharomyces strain is combined with a nonconventional yeast displaying a specific trait, such as lactose utilization (Taya et al ., 1984; Farahnak et al ., 1986; Krishnamoorthy et al ., 2010; Guo et al ., 2012), temperature tolerance (Sakanaka et al ., 1996), osmotolerance (Spencer et al ., 1985; Loray et al ., 1995; Lucca et al ., 2002), starch degradation (Kishida et al ., 1996), killer activity (Gunge & Sakaguchi, 1981), malic acid degradation (Carrau et al ., 1994), or (hemi)cellulose hydrolysate utilization (Pina et al ., 1986; Heluane et al ., 1993; Table1). …”
Section: Natural and Artificial Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a separate study (Krishnamoorthy et al 2010), fused S. cerevisiae and K. marxianus and the resultant fusants produced more ethanol than the parent strain (12.5% from 18.09 g L −1 of biomass). Earlier in 1996, Sakanaka et al (1996) also fused S. cerevisiae and K. marxianus. Among the 40 fusants obtained fusant F1 showed better traits than its parental strains in terms of its growth at high temperature and fermentation abilities.…”
Section: Protoplast Fusion and Genome Shufflingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The metabolic alteration of the yeast for ethanol production has been attempted through mutation, fusion, and recombination. Improvements in yeast metabolism have been reported by mutation and fusion between S. cerevisiae and Zygosaccharomyces fermentati [7], S. cerevisiae and Pichia stipitis [8], Kluyveromyces marxianus TS8-1 and TS87-8 [9], and S. cerevisiae and Candida shehatae [10]. During culture passages, however, some fusants were dissociated into segregants resembling the parental strains [8], and fusant offspring are almost completely sterile mainly because of the inability of the chromosomes of the partner genomes to pair or to recombine [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%