2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10336-009-0383-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breeding Barn Swallows Hirundo rustica on organic and conventional arable farms in the Netherlands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Barn Swallow nests were also counted on all these farms during spring 2005. Skylark and Lapwing were both breeding in higher densities on organic farms (Kragten and de Snoo 2008), but there was no difference in the number of breeding Barn Swallows between the two farming types (Kragten et al 2009). In contrast to Skylarks, breeding densities of other species feeding mainly on ground-dwelling invertebrates, such as Yellow Wagtail Motacilla flava and Meadow Pipit Anthus pratensis , did not differ between the two farming systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Barn Swallow nests were also counted on all these farms during spring 2005. Skylark and Lapwing were both breeding in higher densities on organic farms (Kragten and de Snoo 2008), but there was no difference in the number of breeding Barn Swallows between the two farming types (Kragten et al 2009). In contrast to Skylarks, breeding densities of other species feeding mainly on ground-dwelling invertebrates, such as Yellow Wagtail Motacilla flava and Meadow Pipit Anthus pratensis , did not differ between the two farming systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In this way, not only was an overall picture obtained of the effects of organic farming on bird food abundance, but insights were also obtained into which types of crop potentially provide the greatest availability of food items. Breeding bird surveys have also been carried out on the same farms included in this study (Kragten and de Snoo 2008, Kragten et al 2009). Consequently, this study could provide additional insight into the effects of differences in food abundance between organic and conventional arable farms on breeding bird densities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A less intensive approach to farming and a more wildlife-friendly agriculture, which should be promoted by the future Common Agricultural Policy, may be beneficial for farmland birds in general (Báldi and Batáry 2011) and, hopefully, also for the Barn Swallow. However, the benefit of an environmentally friendly approach to agriculture for Barn Swallow is not unequivocal, as this species was found to be more abundant in organic than in traditional farms in Denmark (Christensen et al 1996), but not in the Netherlands (Kragten and de Snoo 2008, Kragten et al 2009). In addition, Barn Swallows population levels were not correlated with agricultural intensification in Britain (Robinson et al 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example of a bird species closely associated with agricultural activities and humans, and very sensitive to recent changes in agriculture, is the Barn Swallow Hirundo rustica [4][5][6]. This species breeds mainly in buildings where farm animals, mainly cows or pigs, are kept [7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ongoing intensification of agriculture, especially a decline in the number of small farm holdings, termination of dairy farming and changes in the distribution of cattle, are shown as the main factors reducing breeding sites. This, in turn, has affected the negative trend of Barn Swallow numbers in rural areas of north-western Europe [3,[5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. Møller [8,9] maintains that the decline of Barn Swallow populations is caused mainly by the reduction of its food resources, large Diptera, associated with cow rearing, mostly horse flies Tabanidae, hover flies Syrphidae and muscid flies Muscidae, which may constitute over 90% of the diet [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%