2021
DOI: 10.2478/orhu-2021-0010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breeding biology of the Woodcock (Scolopax rusticola L.) in the Carpathian Basin

Abstract: Based on 356 observations of Woodcock nestings published in the Hungarian hunting and ornithological literature between 1846 and 2019, which also includes published and unpublished personal observations, it can be stated that the nesting dates of Woodcock in Hungary are scattered over a large interval. 47.3% of all nestings registered with exact dates (n=93) happen in April. The second peak of breeding in June does not stand out significantly. Based on the data of the clutches (n=65) reported with known number… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
1
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It appears that proportionally far fewer nests were found in the second half of May than in the first half of the month or before. This finding is in line with the results of previous studies (Haraszthy 2019, Bende & László 2020b, Bende 2021.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It appears that proportionally far fewer nests were found in the second half of May than in the first half of the month or before. This finding is in line with the results of previous studies (Haraszthy 2019, Bende & László 2020b, Bende 2021.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Haraszthy (2019) reported the earliest complete brood from 1-10 March (n = 1). However, these were extremely rare, consistent with the results obtained by Haraszthy (2019) and Bende and László (2020b). Nesting was prolonged in the Carpathian Basin, with a peak in April and May, and there was no difference in this between the two regions with the most data.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Az ismert tojásszámmal közölt fészekaljak adatai, továbbá a magyarországi tojásgyűjteményekben fellelhető -valószínűsíthetően teljes tojásszámú -fészekaljak alapján az átlagos fészekaljankénti tojásszám 3,8 volt. A vizsgált időszakban megfigyelt szalonkacsaládok adatai alapján az egy tojóra jutó csibék száma 3,6 példány volt, amiből a tojók átlagosan 2,8 csibét tudtak felnevelni röpképes korig (Bende 2021, Bende és László 2021.…”
Section: Szaporodásbiológia éS öKológiai Mortalitásunclassified