1980
DOI: 10.1007/bf00023215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breeding cassava for resistance to cassava mosaic disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
179
1

Year Published

1982
1982
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 197 publications
(187 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
7
179
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The CMD incidence represented the percentage of diseased plants compared to the total number of plants present in the plot. The CMD symptom severity was assessed for each plant in the plot using a scale of 1 to 5 described by Hahn et al, [12] and Terry and Hahn [13], where: 1 = no symptoms; 2 = mild chlorosis, mild distortions at bases of most leaves, while the remaining parts of the leaves and leaflets appear green and healthy; 3 = pronounced mosaic pattern on most leaves, narrowing and distortion of the lower one-third of the leaflets; 4 = severe mosaic distortion of two thirds of most leaves and general reduction of leaf size and stunting of shoots; and 5 = very severe mo-saic symptoms on all leaves, distortion, twisting, misshapen and severe leaf reductions of most leaves accompanied by severe stunting of plants.…”
Section: Data Recorded and Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CMD incidence represented the percentage of diseased plants compared to the total number of plants present in the plot. The CMD symptom severity was assessed for each plant in the plot using a scale of 1 to 5 described by Hahn et al, [12] and Terry and Hahn [13], where: 1 = no symptoms; 2 = mild chlorosis, mild distortions at bases of most leaves, while the remaining parts of the leaves and leaflets appear green and healthy; 3 = pronounced mosaic pattern on most leaves, narrowing and distortion of the lower one-third of the leaflets; 4 = severe mosaic distortion of two thirds of most leaves and general reduction of leaf size and stunting of shoots; and 5 = very severe mo-saic symptoms on all leaves, distortion, twisting, misshapen and severe leaf reductions of most leaves accompanied by severe stunting of plants.…”
Section: Data Recorded and Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates that the leaves reflected little diffused light within red-green region compared with the reflections from the blue-yellow region. The pink regions in the b* layer describe the diffuse reflections from the yellow portions of the original image, confirming the fact that yellow reflects more light to the human eye than any other colour in the visible region (Hahn, Terry, & Leuschner, 1980).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Percentage of infested plants = Number of plants with CGM damage / Total Number observed × 100 Severity for both pests and diseases was scored on a scale of 1 to 5 where 1 represents no symptom and 5 represents severe infection/infestation (Hahn et al, 1980;Muimba, 1982;Muyolo 1984;Legg and Bouwmeester, 2010) at 3, 6 and 9 months after planting.…”
Section: Scoring Pests and Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%