1983
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1127(83)80006-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breeding eastern white pine: A world-wide perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In southern Ontario (south of 448N latitude with T min > À12.8 8C and T a > 6.8 8C), the interspecific hybrids had competitive survival rates and often superior growth to P. strobus 20-43 years post-establishment (Table 3). These results agree with the reported heterosis between P. strobus and P. wallichiana (Kriebel, 1983), but also suggest that such heterosis might only be detectable when the interspecific hybrids had expressed their growth potential under favorable environmental conditions.…”
Section: Survival and Growthsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In southern Ontario (south of 448N latitude with T min > À12.8 8C and T a > 6.8 8C), the interspecific hybrids had competitive survival rates and often superior growth to P. strobus 20-43 years post-establishment (Table 3). These results agree with the reported heterosis between P. strobus and P. wallichiana (Kriebel, 1983), but also suggest that such heterosis might only be detectable when the interspecific hybrids had expressed their growth potential under favorable environmental conditions.…”
Section: Survival and Growthsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…An alternative strategy in developing stronger genetic resistance to C. ribicola in P. strobus is to integrate resistance genes from Eurasian white pine species that have co-evolved with C. ribicola and demonstrate strong natural resistance to the pathogen (Heimburger, 1962(Heimburger, , 1972Bingham, 1972;Kriebel, 1983;Garrett, 1985;Zsuffa, 1985). In Ontario, Canada, interspecific hybrids of P. strobus and P. wallichiana A.B.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be stressed that in this progeny test, parental selection was random with regard to growth and for this reason heritability and consequently genetic gains are underestimated. A similar case was reported by KRIEBEL (1983) in eastern white pine (Pinus strobus L.). XIANG et al (2003b) reported that full-sib family selection in loblolly pine produced 40 % genetic gain over selection on half-sib families while CARSON (1986) reported that in radiata pine, the highest gain could be made by selection and controlled intermating of high g.c.a.…”
Section: Selection and Genetic Gainsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Pinus peuce is often planted as an ornamental tree worldwide (Lines, 1985;Merrill et al, 1996;Mortenson & Mack, 2006). This pine hybridizes easily with P. strobus and P. monticola and usually produces abundant viable seed (Lu & Derbowka, 2009); therefore, it has been used in genetic trials to provide blister rust resistance to these white pine species (Kriebel, 1983;Blada, 2000;Sniezko et al, 2008). Few diseases and little related damage are reported for P. peuce in its native range (Lines, 1985); however, this pine from the Balkans appears highly susceptible to infection and damage from this needle blight.…”
Section: Differential Susceptibility Among Five-needle Pine Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%