2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.19284.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breeding success at the range margin of a desert species: implications for a climate‐induced elevational shift

Abstract: If the breeding range of a species is limited by biotic or abiotic environmental factors that depress breeding success at the range margin, then range expansion is expected when those limiting factors are alleviated. Over a three‐year period, we measured breeding success of a desert species, black‐throated sparrow Amphispiza bilineata, along a steep elevation gradient between the Peninsular Mountains and Colorado Desert (San Diego County, California) that is undergoing a warming trend. We compared breeding suc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this system, desert scrub species have been shown to have increased reproductive success at higher elevations at distribution margins compared with lower elevations where the birds are more common, at least during dry years (Hargrove, 2010), which seems to support the tendency towards upward shifts. However, not all species shifted upwards, and some species may have a persistent preference for desert scrub habitat despite lower reproductive success (Hargrove & Rotenberry, 2011). Thus, distributional correlations with climate may be less sensitive than local-scale reproductive success in predicting distributional shifts, and, furthermore, it is possible that biotic associations can override or delay climate-induced range shifts, particularly if habitat features such as vegetation composition and structure lag behind climate change.…”
Section: Distribution Margins Of Birdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this system, desert scrub species have been shown to have increased reproductive success at higher elevations at distribution margins compared with lower elevations where the birds are more common, at least during dry years (Hargrove, 2010), which seems to support the tendency towards upward shifts. However, not all species shifted upwards, and some species may have a persistent preference for desert scrub habitat despite lower reproductive success (Hargrove & Rotenberry, 2011). Thus, distributional correlations with climate may be less sensitive than local-scale reproductive success in predicting distributional shifts, and, furthermore, it is possible that biotic associations can override or delay climate-induced range shifts, particularly if habitat features such as vegetation composition and structure lag behind climate change.…”
Section: Distribution Margins Of Birdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Precipitation changes were more spatially heterogeneous, with spatial covariation increasing across the northern part of the state and decreasing across the southern part [27,28]. Elevational ranges of species in California over this period have shifted heterogeneously, including species moving upslope, downslope or not at all [13,14,29]. Heterogeneity in movements of species has been partly explained by incorporating local-scale measures of climatic change for both temperature and precipitation [14,30]; increases in the former usually favour upslope shifts, while increases in the latter typically favour downslope movements.…”
Section: Nne Nearest Neighbour Elevation (M)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This variation in ecological traits across latitudinal or elevational gradients can in turn affect reproductive potential and rates of population growth, especially at range limits [19], [20]. Under climate change, the structure of latitudinal and elevational temperature gradients can be modified, affecting population growth rates, especially at the leading and trailing edge of the gradient within species' ranges [21], [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%