Brexit and labour governance: Authoritarian innovations in the United Kingdom

Abstract

The concept of authoritarian innovations encourages a focus on authoritarian change at the meso-level of governance. At the same time, this article argues that such meso-level change can be best understood by taking into account macro-level (authoritarian) developments. In the UK, Brexit has generated a broader macro-level authoritarian innovation, creating cumulative effects at the level of politics, governance and jurisdiction. This macro-level development is reflected in authoritarian innovation at the meso-level of labour governance. The article first explains how Brexit relates to three key drivers for authoritarian innovations in labour governance, namely, general authoritarian inclination, neoliberal policy and electoral populist motivations. It then analyses the main authoritarian innovations in labour governance adopted since Brexit, namely, the approach to the legacy of EU protective standards and new policy measures limiting the right to strike. Using a discourse on democracy, acting against the ‘undemocratic EU’ and relying on ‘the referendum mandate’, UK governance post-Brexit is characterised by reducing pluralist processes and even parliamentary debate, enabling these authoritarian innovations. At the same time, due to the inherent contradictory forces inspiring Brexit, the long-term impact of Brexit on labour governance will likely remain modest.