2020
DOI: 10.1177/0038026120914177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brexit as heredity redux: Imperialism, biomedicine and the NHS in Britain

Abstract: What is the relationship between Brexit and biomedicine? Here we investigate the Vote Leave official campaign slogan ‘We send the EU £350 million a week. Let’s fund our NHS instead’ in order to shed new light on the nationalist stakes of Brexit. We argue that the Brexit referendum campaign must be situated within biomedical policy and practice in Britain. We propose a re-thinking of Brexit through a cultural politics of heredity to capture how biomedicine is structured around genetic understandings of ancestry… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These particular episodes in the Polish history demonstrate how Poland, since the turn of the twentieth century, has occupied an unmarked slot in the practices of ‘ heredity redux ’ (Fitzgerald et al, 2020, p. 3). In the empirical section, I will reveal what these racial practices have enabled in contemporary Poland.…”
Section: Polish Eugenics: Racial Purity and The Fear Of Mongrelisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These particular episodes in the Polish history demonstrate how Poland, since the turn of the twentieth century, has occupied an unmarked slot in the practices of ‘ heredity redux ’ (Fitzgerald et al, 2020, p. 3). In the empirical section, I will reveal what these racial practices have enabled in contemporary Poland.…”
Section: Polish Eugenics: Racial Purity and The Fear Of Mongrelisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, what I have not had opportunity to do in this intervention, but which clearly emerges as a necessary future focus from this paper’s argument, is explore why people might say “no” to appeals. This, I suspect, would require us to take seriously both the historical and contemporary contexts (see Fitzgerald et al 2020 ; Benjamin 2016 ) in which minoritised individuals elect not to engage with biomedical projects like clinical trials, tissue donation and so on. Indeed, rationales for refusal are hinted towards in allusions across the above data to the notion that the state and institutions like the NHS and registries inspire less ‘trust’ than do community organisations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There isn't scope here for detailed discussion of the issue of mistrust in the context of tissue donation, but in the contemporary UK context, "hostile environment" policies in healthcare settings alongside data sharing agreements between health institutions and Government (seeFitzgerald et al 2020) arguably compound more enduring concerns amongst some racially minoritised groups that the health system is not trustworthy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These norms can help establish a moral community whom you can trust, and they may provide the basis for generalized trust. Thus, while they may have been some ambivalence in public attitudes towards government policy trust was enhanced by public support for the NHS as an institution ( Godlee, 2020c ), which also reflected nationalistic values ( Fitzgerald et al ., 2020 ).…”
Section: The Role Of the Publicmentioning
confidence: 99%