Brexit: human resourcing implications

Abstract

Purpose Three years on from the Brexit vote, while it remains a central topic for debate in the media, there has been limited discussion about the human resource (HR) implications. The purpose of this paper is to provide theoretical evaluation and informed discussion, distilled into four interconnected propositions, on how employee resourcing as a HR practice may be impacted following actual Brexit decisions. Design/methodology/approach Drawing on the employee resourcing literature, the paper adopts a discursive approach which examines how the UK’s decision to exit the European Union will affect HR practice. The paper draws comparison with the global recession since 2008, a similarly unprecedented development in its discussion of employee resourcing practices and draws parallels which may help to inform the future of HR practices in the UK, because of Brexit. Findings This paper offers a set of propositions; the flow of talent into the UK may become more restricted and reinvigorate the “war for talent” that followed the effects of the global financial crisis on the UK. To attract and retain workers in relatively lower-skilled roles, employers may be faced with a need to re-skill such roles and adopt more flexible working arrangements. Finally, to meet skilled employment requirements, removal of restrictions to recruit from within the European Economic Area may trigger increased global migration of skilled workers. Originality/value This paper contributes to the discussions regarding the implications of Brexit for HR practice by offering propositions to shape future research agendas.

Rethinking the strategic management of human resources: lessons learned from Covid-19 and the way forward in building resilience

“…In the UK, Brexit has influenced significantly the country's society and economy. As Collings and Isichei (2018) and Ridgway (2019) highlight, Brexit has created a ripple effect in terms of organizations' ability to attract and retain employees. Specifically, the immigration restrictions for individuals coming from the European Economic Area calls for important changes in job design (e.g.…”

“…Specifically, the immigration restrictions for individuals coming from the European Economic Area calls for important changes in job design (e.g. re-skilling roles or adopting flexible work arrangement) and the identification of alternative sources of human capital (Ridgway, 2019). However, the impact of Brexit is not just limited to the geographical boarders of the UK.…”

Human resource management practices in the context of rising right‐wing populism

“…Again, increasing the right to work checks would undermine the position of migrants; this, when combined with a much stricter benefits regime in the United Kingdom, is likely to force more indigenous workers into the bottom end of jobs (Arora, 2019). The prospect of greater restrictions on immigration would further limit the pool of talent organisations can draw from (Ridgway, 2019).…”

London Calls? Discrimination of European Job Seekers in the Aftermath of the Brexit Referendum

“…Our contribution to the literature is threefold. First, we add to an emerging line of research on the impact of Brexit on the subjective and objective vulnerability experienced by EU nationals in the aftermath of the referendum, and in particular on its human resourcing implications ( Ridgway 2019 ). With our field experiment, we provide causal evidence that EU applicants faced discrimination when applying for jobs in England.…”