2011
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1988416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BRIC and the U.S. Financial Crisis: An Empirical Investigation of Stocks and Bonds Markets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aloui et al (2011) show that the stock markets of Brazil and Russia are more dependent on the US stock market conditions than China and India. Similar results are reported by Bianconi et al (2013). Dimitriou et al (2013) use the multivariate fractionally integrated asymmetric power ARCH dynamic conditional correlation (FIAPARCH-DCC) model and report that the dependence between the US and BRICS stock markets is higher in bullish than in bearish markets, highlighting the diversification benefits.…”
Section: Related Studiessupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Aloui et al (2011) show that the stock markets of Brazil and Russia are more dependent on the US stock market conditions than China and India. Similar results are reported by Bianconi et al (2013). Dimitriou et al (2013) use the multivariate fractionally integrated asymmetric power ARCH dynamic conditional correlation (FIAPARCH-DCC) model and report that the dependence between the US and BRICS stock markets is higher in bullish than in bearish markets, highlighting the diversification benefits.…”
Section: Related Studiessupporting
confidence: 73%
“…According to Figure 4.8, it is possible to see that both estimates (DCC and DCLMF) share common information -there is a correlation of 0.31 between both estimates. Moreover, both estimates provide proofs that, in general, China is insulated from the US, despite the fact that there are evidences of risk transmission between these markets -this finding is in line with Bianconi, Yoshino and Sousa (2013) and Syriopoulos, Makram and Boubaker (2015). The DCLMF points to an average correlation of 0.06 and the DCC has an average of 0.02 (in the whole period) -supporting the previous statement.…”
Section: Comparing the Dynamic Correlation Based On Long Memory Filtesupporting
confidence: 78%
“…According to Figure 4.9, DCC and DCLMF also share common information -there is a 0.76 correlation between both estimates. But, differently from the comparison between China and U.S., Brazilian and U.S. markets seem to be reasonably integrated, with an average correlation of 0.3751 (DCLMF) and 0.5175 (DCC) -again, in line with the findings of Bianconi, Yoshino and Sousa (2013) and Bergmann et al (2014). In addition to that, DCLMF seems to allow faster level shifts in comparison to the DCC (when economies are integrated).…”
Section: Comparing the Dynamic Correlation Based On Long Memory Filtesupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bianconi, Yoshino and Sousa (2012) present an analysis of Brazilian financial assets in a comparative context of the BRIC and the influence of the U.S. financial crisis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%