2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-5113-2_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bricolage Practices in Local Forestry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It therefore serves as a fitting framework to interpret our case‐study CBOs' attempts to create lasting change in their respective communities and landscapes. The CBOs under study here used diverse practices of bricolage (de Koning and Benneker, ) to implement linked conservation and rural development projects and to garner recognition from diverse audiences for their accomplishments. Over time, they leveraged this recognition to access diverse networks at multiple scales and used their positions and alliances within these networks to translate community sentiments and capitalize upon new openings for practical implementation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It therefore serves as a fitting framework to interpret our case‐study CBOs' attempts to create lasting change in their respective communities and landscapes. The CBOs under study here used diverse practices of bricolage (de Koning and Benneker, ) to implement linked conservation and rural development projects and to garner recognition from diverse audiences for their accomplishments. Over time, they leveraged this recognition to access diverse networks at multiple scales and used their positions and alliances within these networks to translate community sentiments and capitalize upon new openings for practical implementation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Practical authority is not necessarily created by state actors, and as a concept is particularly well suited to understanding the activities of non‐state actors – including relatively small, resource‐limited actors such as those typically involved in CBNRM implementation. It represents a ‘bottom up’ form of authority constructed through diverse processes of bricolage (de Koning and Benneker, ; Cleaver, ) that may include framing, coalition building, the use of strategic alliances, working at multiple scales and accessing resources in order to put ideas into practice. The creative and pragmatic nature of the concept thus has close affinities with concepts of critical institutionalism (de Koning and Cleaver, ), the concept of ‘creative syncretism’ of Berk and Galvan (), and processes of micro‐institutionalization (Moseley and Charnley, ).…”
Section: Practical Authority and Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This power is largely dependent on the number, and power, of authoritative resources which are allocated to, and mobilised by, the actor. These authoritative resources can take various forms: they can be financial power, or power through access to political or kinship networks (Cleaver 2002: 16–17; de Koning 2011: 227–8).…”
Section: Bricolage and The Institutional Corridormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They do so, first, by legitimizing institutions in their daily practices, and second, by adapting institutions according to their social values and beliefs (Agrawal 2007;Cleaver 2012). Our results particularly highlight the importance of local social arrangements amongst various groups of local actors (De Koning and Benneker 2013). Increasing levels of acceptance of newly introduced institutions in bricolage processes were generally seen to follow from increased interactions between a variety of local actors, including technicians, jobbers, industries, communities, and so on.…”
Section: Local Participation To Strengthen Sfm Implementation Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…It therefore focuses on the role of so-called 'bricoleurs': actors who reshape, refashion, and recombine rules, norms, and beliefs through local bricolage practices to match those with their needs and interests. Critical institutionalism exhibits a much more open attitude than the older institutionalisms towards social and ecological factors and mechanisms to explain governance outcomes, besides purely institutional outcomes (De Koning and Benneker 2013;Ostrom 2009). The more open attitude matches this thesis very well because it focuses on such factors and mechanisms (such as social networks in the global-local nexus and the social-ecological setting in Caatinga biome).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 68%