2015
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)cf.1943-5509.0000571
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bridge Failure Rate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
41
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
41
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The nominal lifetime and nominal event reliability approaches produced annual failure probabilities in the range of 0.023-0.08% annually (1.7-5.8% over a 75-year lifetime). These probabilities are of the same order of magnitude as previous annual collapse rate estimates (1 in 5,000 or 0.02%) (Cook et al 2015;Arneson et al 2012;Kattell and Eriksson 1998), which are inclusive of all possible collapse causes and thus more comparable to the nominal lifetime reliability value.…”
Section: Collapse Risk and Potential Impact Of Climate Land-use Or supporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The nominal lifetime and nominal event reliability approaches produced annual failure probabilities in the range of 0.023-0.08% annually (1.7-5.8% over a 75-year lifetime). These probabilities are of the same order of magnitude as previous annual collapse rate estimates (1 in 5,000 or 0.02%) (Cook et al 2015;Arneson et al 2012;Kattell and Eriksson 1998), which are inclusive of all possible collapse causes and thus more comparable to the nominal lifetime reliability value.…”
Section: Collapse Risk and Potential Impact Of Climate Land-use Or supporting
confidence: 77%
“…Several studies have estimated an annual hydraulic collapse frequency of approximately 1/5,000 (e.g., Nowak and Collins 2012). Scour-erosion of the soil supporting bridge foundations-alone has been estimated to cause the collapse of 20-100 bridges per year in the United States (Briaud et al 2007;Cook et al 2015;Stein and Sedmera 2006) of a total population of bridges over water of approximately 504,000 (FHWA 2012). Hydraulic and other collapse causes have been linked to substantial direct and indirect costs, casualties, and user delays and increased greenhouse gas emissions resulting from detours and delays (Suarez et al 2005;Stein and Sedmera 2006;Stein et al 1999;Neumann et al 2015;Wright et al 2012;Cook et al 2015;Briaud et al 2007Briaud et al , 2014.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common cause of bridge failure is the scouring of bed material around bridge foundations during floods. According to Cook, Barr, and Halling (), hydraulic damage occurred in 52% of bridge failures, with the primary cause being scour. The accumulation of debris and drifts around a bridge pier can then substantially modify and increase local scour patterns (Pagliara & Carnacina, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The collapse of bridges inevitably leads to economically losses and not seldom is responsible for human losses. Local scouring around the foundations is the most common bridge failure cause worldwide [1,2]. The presence of a bridge pier leads to the formation of a scour hole, from which entrainment and transport of sediments are influenced by the turbulent structures therein developed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%